| 1 |
Avra |
Jain |
4/10/23 |
Climate Resilience Committee Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
How much of the Miami 21 Task Force Report is being reviewed as part of your work with the EAR? |
All of the Miami 21 Task Force Report is being reviewed as part of this project |
| 2 |
Wayne |
Pathman |
4/10/23 |
Climate Resilience Committee Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
Is there a Section that deals with sustainability? |
Yes. Most specifically, the Coastal Management Element. Recently, the Peril of Flood and related amendments were adopted, which the Climate Resilience Committee influenced and the Office of Resilience and Sustainability made important contributions toward. |
| 3 |
Wayne |
Pathman |
4/10/23 |
Climate Resilience Committee Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
How can this Committee be move involved? What things can be done for us to be a part of this? We'd like to have input or a workshop. Could we have some important part in what goes into the plan? |
Yes. The best way to accomplish this is by participating in our Public Outreach Meetings coming up. In addition, you can contact the Comprehensive Planning team through the ORS liaison with your questions or suggestions. |
| 4 |
Wayne |
Pathman |
4/10/23 |
Climate Resilience Committee Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
When you finish the process, it'd be great if we could have a workshop. Could you let us know when you have a blueprint ready? |
Yes. |
| 5 |
Rose |
Lesniak |
5/13/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Traffic
3. Green & open spaces |
Transportation |
Need to work on utilizing trains, bright line and building new roads to make miami a place one wants to live and work in |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.7
Policy TR-2.4.1
Policy TR-2.4.5
Policy IC-2.1.8 |
| 6 |
Gisela |
Haynes |
5/22/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure |
Other |
The Playhouse in Coconut Grove was an important cultural attribute to this section of town! When is it going to be used for plays again? ? be |
Noted |
| 7 |
James |
Jenkins |
5/22/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Tree coverage |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
As a Florida licensed architect, I watch the rapid development taking place throughout the city and worry that hardscape is quickly replacing the green areas that were so influential to my making Miami my home. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-2.1.1
Policy NR-1.4.2 |
| 8 |
Marta |
Marello |
5/23/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Density
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coverage |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
I feel strongly that our neighborhood -and neighborhoods in general-apply teh type of zoning that promotes mixed use buildings and increases density (not necessarily high rises but low and mid-rise buildings which increases housing options). I also feel strongly to design neighborhoods that prioritize pedestrians and byciclces and implement traffic calming infrastructure to protect kids playing in the streets and those without a car. Sidewalks need to be wide and shaded. Design neighborhoods to give less space to cars, and more public and community spaces away from cars and noisy roads. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.4.2
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy NR-1.4.1
Objective TR-1.4 |
| 9 |
Sylvia |
Novoselic |
5/23/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
Other |
The map does not include our neighborhood (at least I was not able to navigate to it) |
Respondent said they lived in Tamiami, which is part of unincorporated Miami-Dade County. |
| 10 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o District 4 (and citywide) residents’ housing needs have not been met including the lack of sufficient housing,
available services, retail and amenities within communities.
o Older adults are the most prone to challenges, as for example, garbage trucks moving too fast past houses and
older adults are unable to keep up with sanitation vehicles
o Irregular schedules and rushed routes make trash everywhere
o Women in general experience more difficulty
o Unmet housing needs: largest necessity for communities within the City is affordable housing
o Top issues developers face in supplying affordable housing:
o Cost of construction/materials
o Permitting and entitlements process: Public works and building departments take the longest for
approvals
o Example: The General Contractor test or an equivalent is required as the minimum education attainment
for someone to apply for construction permits, not everyone has that or may need that exam
o Many City neighborhoods have good proximity and access to amenities, retail and office spaces
o District 4 has insufficient rental units as a housing type
o Zoning uses are separated making mixing of uses difficult in established neighborhoods, creating more isolated
houses and businesses
o Multifamily I sonly feasible outside of downtown or TOD with high density zones (T6-8, T6-12 or sometimes T5)
o Senate Bill 102 (Live Local Act) will increase multifamily activity by allowing the potential for affordable housing
on industrial/commercial zones, with the exemptions of ad valorem taxes
o Industrial lands are favorable to developers since there are fewer single family-zoned properties that will
be impacted
o Allapattah offers good examples of included higher density housing in older neighborhood
o Not much zoning/land use change is necessary to get dense housing in District 4
o Developers are looking at old big box or industrial sites around two to four acres as a catalyst site
o Sears project in Fort Lauderdale is a good example of how SB 102 can create catalytic effects
o Insurance significantly affects housing with high rates and creates extensive difficulty with the building process of
housing
o If an owner wants to build additional units on lower density property or larger land area (e.g. and ADU)
insurance limits that ability
o There is a need for efficient economies of scale: must create the “right mix” of human needs (education, personal
services/day care, restaurants, shops, entertainment – jobs maybe not so much in Miami with the strong job
economy right now)
o Apart from a larger supply of units, we need this entire “ecosystem” of a great neighborhood including services,
retail and amenities to see good community development |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.16
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-4.1.2
Goal LU-5
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.2
Policy HO-1.1.3
Policy HO-1.1.1
Goal LU-3
Goal LU-5 |
| 11 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Housing supply is sufficient, however the coexistence of different populations with different household incomes in a community is missing
o Need more affordable housing to be available to the public to accomplish mixed income neighborhoods
o Infrastructural deficiencies make it so we shouldn’t build high density but should build more (single family) homes
o City’s growth policies should maintain current densities
o Growing concerns about the future resilience and the sustainability of the City |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective LU-1.1
Objective LU-4.1
Goal LU-5
Goal LU-6
Policy CI-1.2.2
Goal CM-4 |
| 12 |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
o Building more affordable housing is a necessity
o Preferences for duplexes in District 4 rather than high density high rises
o Mitigation efforts should be in place to reduce costs of housing and overcrowding within communities as well as the overflow of parking
o More resources should be pumped into the neighborhoods
o Insurance rates are causing many issues, reducing the ability for residents, especially low income individuals, to afford housing
o Pedestrian walkways (sidewalks) need to be improved to alleviate safety concerns and increase accessibility |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-1.5.2
Policy TR-2.2.1
Goal LU-4
Goal HO-1 |
| 13 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o A better, more efficient metro-system needs to be in place
o How to regulate traffic flow, more bicycle lane
o Control motorbikes and increase parking spaces dedicated to motorcycles
o Issues include very narrow streets, hidden stop signs by vegetation (trees), Lack of street parking and heavy o traffic congetion during peak hours (morning and afternoons) to travel only a few miles |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-1.5.3
Goal TR-2
Policy NR-3.2.2
Policy NR-3.2.3
Policy IC-2.1.5
Goal LU-1
Goal LU-1.1.7 |
| 14 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o For developers, biggest issues or delays in getting a project out of the ground regards parking standards and not having enough variations
o Based on available space, the feasibility of building a development at half a parking space per unit in District 4 may pose concerns due to the presence of several one-car households
o Unsure if District 4 will embrace parking standards (i.e. fewer parking spaces per unit) as other neighborhoods have done
o City should pursue mobility ideas that alleviates parking pressure on one-car households:
o Free trolleys on 37th Street.
o Safety issues with walking and taking public transit are still present in places of District 4
o Neighborhoods in close proximity to transit or intersections with bus/train stops that have a longer wait times lack a complete sense of security is not satisfied
o Not many bicycles or similar forms of transportation readily observed within the area, highlighting a more automobile reliant community
o Street racing is a serious concern: takes place on 7th Avenue and other industrial/commercial east/west corridors creating a dangerous environment for pedestrians to navigate the streets.
o Immediate and easy transit access from housing is needed for success
o New residents demand housing that is accessible to bus routes or is close to areas with sufficient connectivity and ease of access.
o Uber and other transportation network companies (TNC’s) can cost a developer millions since they might have mistakenly built too many spaces that weren’t demanded
o Should the city be considering design guidelines that encourage or require adaptive re-use of parking structures?
o No, not really feasible although planners want it – garage space can only be utilized for low-revenue activities like special events e.g. movies on the roof
o The “sweet spot” constitutes approaching a zero requirement, which is only present in downtown.
o Family units: approximately 0.8 per unit, Elderly units: 0.4 per unit
o Bicycle racks are required, however they are rarely used. The same issue exists with EV: 1 or 2 cars
o Every new development will consist of the most current green technology.
o There are significant quantities of microunits and parking within the downtown area but are lacking in the secondary markets. The new developments within the area are advancing transportation goals, but the secondary, outer markets are being neglected.
o More flexibility is necessary for parking requirements to adequately accommodate the growing population. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-1.4.4
Objective TR-1.5
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.3.2
Policy LU-1.1.7
Goal LU-1
Policy NR-3.2.2
Policy NR-3.2.3 |
| 15 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Very heavy traffic within the City even with the presence of public transportation
o Shortage of bicycle lanes, pedestrian accessibility is narrowed
o Lack of space restricts roundabouts implementation for much needed traffic calming
o Safety of residents impacted as they are unable to walk or ride a bicycle within the area without potential hazards
o This includes street racing and an overall automobile intensive/reliant City
o Transportation network (function el tp*) and the associated applications are very functional.
o There should be continuous non-synchronized lights in the region of Coral Way and 67th Street* |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-1.4.4
Objective TR-1.5
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.3.2 |
| 16 |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Not enough public transportation (buses) service for District 4 residents
o Traffic from major streets that flow into residential areas need to be mitigated
o Technology can be a factor causing congestion. Cleaner energy vehicles such as electric buses should be incorporated within the transit system to create a more sustainable environment
o Instead of speed bumps, traffic circles can be implemented to alleviate traffic congestion alongside other methods to create a better, more efficient traffic flow. In addition, more trolleys can be introduced to provide more public transportation options
o Wish list items include smart lights (traffic signals utilizing artificial intelligence to identify pedestrians/vehicles) on 8th Street |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-1.4.4
Policy TR-1.5.2
Policy TR-2.2.5 |
| 17 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation
Economy |
Create more programs at parks to foster interactions and attract more residents. Programs that are introduced to parks should be properly promoted to make residents aware of the activities to garner higher participation rates. The diversity of programs is appreciated at the parks.
There are safety concerns for pedestrians to access the parks due to reckless driving (people running through stop signs) and heavy automobile usage causing traffic.
Smoke shops that are in close proximity to schools should be removed.
Police officers need to have more active involvement in local schools in order to strip the bad connotations attached to officers or to remove the image of officers as a threat. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-3.1.1
Policy PR-3.1.3
Objective PR-4.1 |
| 18 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation
Economy |
o Parks and open spaces are critical to desirable development.
o It is unlikely that the City will acquire or annex land to provide more parks on a large scale due to the need to retain revenue and there is a higher demand to increase the housing supply.
o The construction of the soccer stadium did not impact the net loss of parks.
o D.R.E.A M is helping with the preservation of parks, especially in districts such as district 4.
o Although there are certain parks and recreation facilities that may be more desirable for development, the existing open spaces should be upgraded rather than solely constructing new parks. With the increase in homes, the park issues will be fixed.
o Housing throughout the City is at 100 percent capacity.
o Based on current demand, the question still remains whether amenities have a higher priority than parks and recreational facilities.
o With the Alp Project, a rooftop garden was added on 1-2 acres.
o In all age buildings are not being readily used, however the community room is the most frequently used.
o With regard to the trends of the rental market, the projects dedicated to the all-age buildings in comparison to the elderly homes are inconsistent in usage. The P.C. Room is rarely used by all-age residents, however the elderly frequently utilize this space in addition to community rooms.
o For dog parks, residents utilize the spaces, but not as consistently to be regarded as high demand.
o The current setbacks and layers for open spaces create issues with parking. In addition, transportation is required at property lines to facilitate accessibility.
o Green spaces are a potential opportunity within District 4, not in D.T.
o Based on calculations, microunits within 20 story buildings and higher densities are not feasible due to costs. Duplexes and low density multifamily homes are more suitable
o Developers looking at studios in Allapattah as a feasible housing option to introduce but
o 1) must have transit and amenities nearby and 2) must be larger 600+ SF |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-2.1.1
Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.1
Policy PR-2.2.5
Goal PR-3
Objective PR-3.1
Policy PR-3.1.2 |
| 19 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation
Economy |
o The parks are considered safe and easily accessible (five-minute distance) with the presence of recreational facilities such as a soccer field and basketball court, which is utilized frequently. However, existing parks can be expanded and more parks are needed as areas between 57th avenue and 32nd avenue do not have parks. There is also a need for more exercise equipment outdoors, ‘no sao en el gimnasio’
o More public art should be incorporated into the environment as well as cultural activities including dancing and exercise sessions. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.1.2
Objective PR-4.1
Policy PR-6.2.3
olicy PR-2.1.1
Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.1
Policy PR-2.2.5
Goal PR-3
Objective PR-3.1
Policy PR-3.1.2 |
| 20 |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
Table 5 (Spanish) |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation
Economy |
Currently, the equipment at parks do not function efficiently, the grass is not well-maintained and the funds dedicated to park improvements and maintenance are not being utilized appropriately. Parks should ensure more security features are implemented such as fences for protection purposes whilst maintaining easy access to the area. There is a demand for parks that have activation for kids. The variety of programs/activities for all ages at parks, both recreational and educational as well as family inclusive sparks the interest of residents. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.2.2
Objective PR-4.1
Objective PR-5.3
Policy PR-5.3.3
olicy PR-2.1.1
Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.1
Policy PR-2.2.5
Goal PR-3
Objective PR-3.1
Policy PR-3.1.2 |
| 21 |
Table 0 |
Table 1 |
5/23/23 |
West End Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Improve Mall of the Americas (not in District 4, in Unincorporated County)
o Make jobs more accessible for the community; Residents experience difficulty to obtain jobs locally. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal EDU-2
Objective EDU-2.1
Policy EDU-2.1.1 |
| 22 |
Neal |
Schafers |
5/25/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
With sea level rise and increasing large and dangerous storms, nothing is more important right now than preparing Miami for living with water, being adaptable, and ensuring residents and businesses can continue to survive and flourish in South Florida |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.8.2
Objective LU-6.1.1
Policy LU-6.2.3
Policy IC-2.1.8 |
| 23 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
5/31/23 |
Shenandoah Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Community needs smaller units to accommodate young adults starting a careers.
o Units that also accommodate residents/professionals that provide services to neighborhood: police, teachers who do not all get to own property due to rising prices.
o Want these services to be provided within the community and not to come from outside areas, which builds stronger community ties. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-4.1.2
Policy HO-2.1.11
Policy LU-1.1.10
Policy LU-1.3.15 |
| 24 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
5/31/23 |
Shenandoah Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Uses serving neighborhood or corridor streets would reduce local traffic to and from the area, especially when taking children to school for errands. Simple, everyday activities can be completed when walking kids to and from school. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.15
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-6.1.2 |
| 25 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
5/31/23 |
Shenandoah Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Form interlocal agreement with Miami-Dade County Public Schools to provide parking, especially for the new pool and added uses, outside of school hours.
o Population growth of Gen X must be addressed since this is the demographic we will shortly be catering to.
o Listen to City Staff and their recommendations when it comes to planning and zoning matters as well as traffic engineers.
o More public art.
o Provide resources for and plant trees in areas which lack them.
o More variety of trees and ask the community types they prefer to see and where. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-6.2.3
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy NR-1.4.4
Policy IC-1.1.1 |
| 26 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Homeowners insurance
o FL Rebuild/Liberty City Trust
o Drainage/ public right-of-way/ pavement
o ADUs/ trailers
o Programs for repairs
o Definition of affordable housing vs low-moderate income
o No rent control
o Edison Place apt
o Building inspection
o Streetlights |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-4.1.3
Policy HO-1.1.6
Goal SS-6
Objective SS-2.1
Policy SS-2.2.4
Policy LU-4.1.3
Policy HO-2.1.10
|
| 27 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o What is affordable housing? What's the dollar figure?
o It must be tiered or based on income: $1,500/month rent is not affordable
o Has to serve low-to-moderate incomes – “affordable” AMI levels are no longer attainable
o Many on fixed incomes due to disabilities, not just seniors
o Those getting Social Security cannot afford “affordable” units
o $24k yearly cost is more feasible, not $34k like it is now
o Used to have a pathway to ownership
o Just renting makes families devoid of generational wealth
o Rent to own is and was a great program – several neighbors have experienced this
o Habitat for Humanity homes are good as it’s based on income
o One instance of a building owner pooling rental payments then offering down payment assistance – this is still a potential solution
o Another neighbor rented to own and was the first offered to buy a unit
o Need more conversations between potential rent-to-own program property owners, District 5/the City and renters
o Connection between Section 8 and Habitat is a good example of what works to help subsidize the gap
o Another neighbor was paying $850 to rent years ago – might as well own
o Need to do something about construction problems on new affordable buildings ( NE 62nd St (Transit Village towers) or too fast
o All of District 5 needs reinvestment. Not any particular spot
o 15th St was alive, bustling. Now it’s dead, places where people can't get a loan.
o The area we used to call “Northside” was dead, opened up shops now alive
o Need every kind of commercial - moved flea market, could use that space
o Everything they did to Midtown you can do here!
o Magic City Innovation District: Loss of history - we need to look at how it works to use investment to get new businesses but not lose long-time folks on fixed incomes
o Connect empty lots to stakeholders instead of building condos |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-5
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 28 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Frustration and fatigue of consultations not leading action
o Insurance costs
o Local residents being priced out of neighborhood
o Local residents denied opportunities in new housing projects
o Improve communication on new housing projects
o More public housing (especially targeted long term residents/minorities)
o Housing needs to respond to broader demographics, and price ranges
o Opportunities to retain 'long time' residents
o Address homelessness with opportunities for housing, employment, care. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy HO-1.4.6
Objective HO-1.5
Objective HO-2.1
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy HO-1.4.1 |
| 29 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Dumping
o Affordable housing - New development doesn't necessarily be accessible to the folks in the community
o Neighborhood maintenance (funding into home improvements) home repairs
o Housing security; applying for assistance
o Florida Rebuild; Y green; needs oversight
o Lack of single family; young people applying and qualifying
o More housing options (with nearby retail and restaurants; entertainment)
o Aff. Housing needs to be locked in over a longer period of time; rents keep going up
o Property insurance keeps going up
o Rental properties that need repairs but are worried to say anything and jeopardize affordable rent
o Home repair funds don't cover all of the needs, plus access; legal assistance; orgs need to better coordinate
o Lack of access to information
o Close loopholes that benefit bldg landlords and contractors
o Slow services |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-5
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 30 |
Table 5 |
Table 5 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Housing for the homeless (under the bridge @ 35th
o Airbnb/vacation rentals
o Two story buildings in residential area and increased # of apartment buildings are increasing in the district
o Noise ordinances for construction
o Need single-family housing
o More greenspace / open space in neighborhood
o Insurance (homeowner insurance increases)
o Busses, food trucks parked in residential areas taking parking spaces
o City trees blocking lamp posts, makes it difficult to see
o Housing isn't affordable anymore and need education lectures on homeownership
o Bodyshops, a lot in neighborhood
o Using vacant properties for parties
o Need for youth apprentice-ship program to help improve housing |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy HO-1.4.6
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy EDU-2.1.1
Policy LU-1.3.4 |
| 31 |
Table 6 |
Table 6 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Unmet housing
o Carmen: Yes. Care for seniors
o Stay in their home as they grow old.
o Housing, not care center
o Lorena: NW 2nd Ave NW 35th & 54th St.
o Housing for the youth (affordable).
o (Buena Vista neighborhood)
o Stanley: Homeless & elderly.
o 62nd St by the bay needs redevelopment + more housing.
o Create an artificial beach for the community
o (not related) flooding, roads (pavements), drainage
o Affordable housing
o Cary Johnson: policy to integrate homeless in the society
o Help them during storms + flooding
o How can you help families that have been living here for generations and can't afford their living expenses anymore |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.16
Policy HO-1.4.6
Policy HO-1.3.3
Policy LU-1.3.16
Objective HO-1.4
Policy HO-1.4.3 |
| 32 |
Table 6 |
Table 6 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Type of housing
o Cary: housing subsidies
o Gentrification (Publix & vet)
o La Tonoa: this area was predominantly African Am.
o Help these households stay in their neighborhood/house
o Programs to promote households buy their house+ |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy HO-1.2.9
Policy HO-2.1.11
Objective LU-4.1 |
| 33 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Trolley not accessible ; needs better service
o 6 days a week vs. 5 days
o Edison HS has access but not northwestern connection w/ Metrorail
o 7th Ave - bike lanes
o Not for daily commute
o Some scooters
o Crosswalk on NW 7th between 58th + 61st St
o Safe road
o Communication for better understanding of budgeting for improvements
o Map design/legibility of buses |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.4.4 |
| 34 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Traffic: I-95 always
o Now in neighborhoods, NW 7th Ave is so congested no one can get through
o All Liberty City is congested: 54th St
o Some caused by 7 cars in the yard - overcrowded house
o As more people flock to Miami, more people = more cars
o Inflow faster than trans. Projects
o Faster lead times - wider extensions
o Help employers incentivize bike/ped
o Env. Impacts: requesting air quality study
o Transit prob is perception - ppl feel unsafe
o Safety perception bike more than transit
o Transit riders want to go to airport and do
o Ppl come into MDC from Glades
o MIA International is too exp. So passengers are going to FLL, makes a new traffic flow.
o All about $ + cost
o Metrorail could go to Miami Beach
o Express bus: need more in local areas
o Last mile problem: people don't want to walk
o Shades for bus shelters: like Broward County’s
o Electric vehicles need to be on roads
o Trolley: needs to go to Metrorail
o See more ppl biking: Jackson Hospital wants to incentivize biking –
o What incentives would work? Free bikes to employees
o Even operators don't know about trolleys networks are there, need to get info out
o Biking needs to feel safer if you invest in it
o Look @ bike lanes + turns lane conflict
o Sunpass is too much
o Education! Most people don’t know what’s out there
o Announcements
o PSA's
o Commercials
o Awareness |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy NR-3.1.1
Policy NR-3.2.1
Policy TR-1.2.9
Policy TR-1.3.3.2
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-1.5.4
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.4.4
Policy TR-2.9.8 |
| 35 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Cars use neighborhoods as cut through, not following speed limits (40MPH + 15MPH)
o Speed calming
o Barriers
o Infrastructure enough to support new development
o Parking
o Street widths
o Poorly maintained
o Streets/potholes/oil contamination
o Routes trucks take bumping on sidewalks cutting corners
o Unsafe to pedestrians
o Too many
o Signage/police should divert elsewhere
o Crumbling streets + homes harmed
o Exit of highway
o 64th street approx.
o Opportunities for free transit (gives opportunities to visit other destinations, parks, events) based on covid experience which equalized all residents
o Not sidewalks
o Width
o Cleaning
o Tree canopy
o Poorly maintained surfacing + landscape
o Safety crosswalks
o Car repairs trucking place within neighborhood causing environmental harm |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.1.3
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.4.2
Policy TR-1.4.4
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.3.1
Policy TR-2.8.2
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy NR-1.4.4
Policy SW-1.3.1
Policy SW-1.3.3
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 36 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Trolleys that circulate to the places that people need to go (stores, pharmacies)
o Bike lanes - more protections (stop signs, adequate space)
o Larger sidewalks - (& buildings further from street)
o Metrorail & Metrobus
o Need to expand trolley network
o Access to amenities (Walmart on 79th cheaper)
o Access for senior (STS) - increase # of bus rides
o Bus stop safety (shelter, lighting, security)
o Shelters limited to certain areas
o Access to Golden Pass (rotate to where seniors gather)
o Youth transportation
o Public school student discount |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-5.1.11
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.4.4 |
| 37 |
Table 5 |
Table 5 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o The trolley schedule needs to be more accessible! The bus schedule is known but not trolley
o People are speeding on residential streets, need more four way stops
o Transportation from neighborhoods to Brightline station
o Need for senior transportation (ex. Doctors appt. and grocery store)
o Car insurance is going up and insurance companies are raising it based on the are you live in
o Cannot get anywhere w/o a car need more bus services
o Need a transportation needs survey
o Transparency over budgeting and seeing money going to the community (penny sales tax)
o Improve the roads (potholes, sidewalks, drainage)
o Drainage problems on roads
o More information on how residents can build a second story (housing)
o Traffic is impacting I-95 and will be at a standstill
o Why isn't more money being invested into transportation
o Why are some of the I-95 exits closed (54th and 53th street exits) |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.1.6
Policy TR-1.4.2
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy CM-6.1.4
Policy SS-2.1.1
Policy SS-2.1.3 |
| 38 |
Table 6 |
Table 6 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Horrible/terrible (a change is needed)
o N Miami Ave (speeding, traffic, )
o More aggressive traffic calming
o Free transit (like during covid)
o Not necessarily (Who's paying for the ride?)
o Park & Ride
o Transit alternatives (trolley, routes (change, improve, not well thought)
o Miami Transit Alliance
o Better Bus Network
o Express ways in highways
o EW 112 pass exception for local residents (told exception)
o Eliminate tolls
o Change individual's mindset towards transit
o Who are the users?
o Crosswalks, stop signs, pedestrian safety
o Improve transit stops (protection het/rain)
o Transit app should be easier to use (seniors, not tech savvy) |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.3.2
Objective TR-2.4
Policy TR-2.4.1 |
| 39 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Public safety makes parks safe
o Surveillance/police
o Two assigned officers
o 12th Ave apt
o Line dancing/aerobics/gym/outdate exercise equipment
o Black history/ other events w/flyers
o Outside gym (needs sanitation)
o Sign-in sheet w/ users
o Gym on corner for youth
o Other smaller parks/ basketball courts
o Moores - 7th + 36th St |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.5.1
Objective PR-5.3
Policy PR-5.3.2
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4 |
| 40 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Greatest needs in District 4 neighborhoods:
o Exercise pavilion at Williams Park,
o Lighting: not just within parks, also sidewalks around them and across the neighborhood
o Baseball fields:
o William Park: lacks what Gibson has - same kids use both
o Desire to bring what facilities are at Gibson to Williams Park!
o Need inclusion: Everyone, every age should have same opportunities
o Youth/teen programming needs:
o Definitely need more, as they get out of school but not just rec
o Training: get teens involved in teaching other kids at recreation programs
o Example: Certification programs: CPR, Medical coding
o More activities to keep them out of trouble
o Swim instructors: struggle to get part-time lifeguards, doesn’t pay, no incentives
o Most used park? Best facilities?
o Hadley Park is busiest, may have best facilities
o Concerns with heavy use? Crossing at night, lighting
o Need pedestrian flashing lights/beacons
o Only in major events
o What events work and what is desired: Williams Park has Christmas Swap
o 4th of July is busiest: parking and crowding becomes a concern
o Now have need for a shuttle, can take older adults, people who don’t want to walk can plan ahead for activities, schedule a ride
o Something like the trolley
o Neighborhood priorities: Add new or improve existing? Improve existing
o New equipment or better maintenance: better maintenance and safety (lighting, patrols)
o More programmed activities or new facilities? More frequent and consistent programs
o Anything else you love to see that is offered elsewhere: baseball field upgrades, to make things cheaper or free
o More activities (not just programs) to attract neighbors: refreshment stands, food trucks
o Park beautification is the most impactful, low hanging fruit
o Adding consistent frequent programming, activities, events and music would be a take-home message |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.2.1
Policy PR-1.5.1
Objective PR-5.3
Policy PR-5.3.2
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4 |
| 41 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Resurfacing walk/run trail
o Usable open space
o Sprinkle system, dog monitoring
o Programmed events (children + seniors)
o Dancing, music, art, interactive
o Improve lighting (on walking trails)
o Should have dog parks
o Areas for different sports
o Think about a variety of uses in parks
o Dog's
o Pick up bags, signage
o Illegal pkg in streets (lack of enforcement)
o Signage poor
o More mini parks
o With restrooms, security, enforcement, lighting
o Lack of pkg for large groups (football, soccer)
o Fencing for safety
o Pool safety measures
o Outdoor electrical hookups for events
o CCTV
o With people watching them |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.2.1
Policy PR-1.5.1
Objective PR-5.3
Policy PR-5.3.1
Policy PR-5.3.2
Policy PR-5.3.7
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4 |
| 42 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Senior activities - consistent programming (gathering, exercise classes + outdoor gyms, sports, cooking classes)
o Miami Park Master Plan
o Youth activities
o Teen programming
o Specific areas for different generations/ age groups
o Multi-use parks
o Activities & education for parents & kids
o Park maintenance |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.1
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4 |
| 43 |
Table 5 |
Table 5 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Lights for parks @ North Bay Vista for people walking & people driving
o (4835 NW 6th Ave) needs light and cameras to increase safety . Also @ 47th & 11th Ave
o Would like to see a park like Tropical Park with sports facilities so that young people can train & play
o More dog parks, there are none nearby. Parks should also include doggy bags and trash cans
o Improve the food at senior services center, especially for people who have special diets
o Improved park equipment and lighting
o Parks are essential to community many residents walk and exercise in the park, especially during the Aerobics and exercise program
o Professional trainers at community center or cardio
o More shade in parks
o Bring back Spanish classes
o Pocket/passive parks, community needs more of them
o Board certification including CPR at parks
o More park employees, parks are short-staffed
o Local kids are not able to use the pool because a bus bring kids from outside the area
o Employ young people to work at parks |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.1
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4
Policy PR-3.1.2
Policy PR-5.3.1
Policy PR-1.1.2 |
| 44 |
Table 6 |
Table 6 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Good mini park for the neighborhood (Buena Vista) (pocket park)
o Buena Vista Park (NW 64th
o Active park (used to be. Still on renovation)
o 59th St & 7th Ave no parks within walking
o Legions Park needs more parking (on/off street parking)
o Good connect. To transit
o After school programs for kids
o More public art/ culture/ murals/ yoga/ food/ swimming pools
o More training/ funding for local artists
o Festivals like North Miami
o Closest museum: Design District, Cultural Art Center, Downtown, Overtown (history of slavery)
o Small spaces reserved within parks
o Health/ wellness for seniors
o Everyone likes this park (everything, great example)
o Update/upgrade libraries |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal PR-4
Policy PR-4.1.4
Objective PR-1.1
Policy PR-6.2.3
Objective PR-1.2 |
| 45 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Lack of parking for Chase bank on 7th Ave
o Other design issues
o Perceptions
o Money is NOT spent
o Funding is lacking
o Funding for sidewalks/drainage
o Money for trolley
o Missing sign stops #51, #17
o 3 years for gym equipment
o Blood pressure measure/ other equipment for health/recreation
o Wynwood vs. our neighborhood
o Bench for bus stop
o 17th + 46th Street
o Vacant lots drive businesses away |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.1.11
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.4.2
Policy TR-2.8.1 |
| 46 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Agree w/ adding + supporting thriving local biz
o 62nd to 55th / 7th Ave is dead post-covid
o Shopping centers vs. local serving-biz? All the above
o Lt of land: by B.P. Station + Church: Would like to see these occupied
o Take land 83rd near the Presidente supermarket: they’re building apartments
o Have a high % of commercial, res is coming in, rather see rev-generating uses!
o N/S Ave's: used to have storefronts, theaters
o Want to leverage growth to invest in small business, e.g. get a loan to renovate the old Theater
o Educ communication: make a guide to reinvestment between city, owners, ppl that want to start
o Do what happened in Midtown: get Pollo Trop. Publix national chains
o Need big anchor chain then the small business will be supported
o Economic boom: not good for this neighborhood but can we make a list of things we want to get? In this plan?
o Neighborhood changed, people/culture changed: one good thing that came with newcomers is neighborhood is looking better
o People moving in are cleaning up homes, increasing everyone's values
o Developers have Hadley Park Midtown in their bullseye and people are moving in because not in a flood zone
o More development speculation is increasing land values |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.2
Policy LU-1.3.9
Policy LU-1.3.15
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11 |
| 47 |
Table 3 |
Table 3 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Policing to make safe neighborhood for businesses
o Opportunities to support locally-owned businesses
o Black owned business
o Improve infrastructure to attract business
o Links strengthened with community groups
o When new development happens focus on local job creation and other community benefits
o Strong community coalition
o Community benefits agreements (CBA)
o People need new skillsets/training
o Construction, plumber, grant writing, IT skills, economic support
o Lack of banks/ serving local communities |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.1
Policy LU-1.3.2
Policy LU-1.3.9
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy LU-6.2.1
Policy HO-1.1.6
Policy PR-5.3.3
Goal EDU-2
Policy EDU-2.1.1 |
| 48 |
Table 4 |
Table 4 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy
Transportation
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Increase access to local amenities
o Cafes, places to gather/mingle
o Walkable
o Jobs (retail, restaurant, movie theaters, cafes, bookstores)
o Affordable rent spaces for businesses
o Businesses charging for parking discourages use
o 7th Ave Chase bank - opportunity for redevelopment - neighborhood center
o Slow traffic
o Add trees
o Make pedestrian friendly
o Ballrooms, places for weddings, banquets
o How to invest in entrepreneurs
o Remove barriers to building different types of housing
o Trade & home ec, programs for youth |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.15
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-5.1.11
Objective HO-2.1
Policy HO-2.1.10
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-2.3.1
Policy EDU-2.1.1
Policy LU-1.3.4 |
| 49 |
Table 5 |
Table 5 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Shopping malls and more businesses & more resources for small businesses
o Need more money coming into community
o More jobs in the neighborhood so that residents in the neighborhood can work near their homes, especially for those who graduated college
o Resources to residents to start businesses
o CDBG funding needed
o Retail and shopping stores (Ross, Burlington)
o NW 2nd Ave is a good location for businesses
o Bring back trade education to high schools
o Business creation and ownership
o Restaurants, Publix, Starbucks
o Publix on 62nd and 12th Publix
o Need hotels
o Bring back Lums (restaurant)
o Fund mom and pop restaurants |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.1
Policy LU-1.3.2
Policy LU-1.3.15
Policy EDU-2.1.1 |
| 50 |
Table 6 |
Table 6 |
6/6/23 |
Hadley Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Easy to find if you are educated
o You need an address
o Help/support to nonprofits/community organizations/comm. Leaders
o Access to grants/funding
o Technical schools
o Better communication (advertised) so that people know about the available programs
o More manufacturing that benefits local communities
o Sec 3 needs to be enforced
o Career source centers (more, better advertised, comm.)
o Language requirements for only English speakers
o Preference for non-English speakers in certain areas
o More opportunities
o Econ. Disparity study
o Local jobs
o Car is the most common mode of transportation
o 20-25 min is the most common commute
|
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.1
Policy LU-1.3.2
Policy LU-1.3.15
Policy EDU-2.1.1 |
| 51 |
Laura |
Cherney |
6/12/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Affordable housing for long time residents that live and work in the city is essential. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-4.1.1
Goal HO-1
Policy HO-1.1.3
Policy HO-1.2.2 |
| 52 |
Iris |
Escarra |
6/13/23 |
email |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
Lakisha, Sevanne: Good afternoon. I attended the EAR Amendment online lunch series today. I think it was engaging and informative. As you all gather input on a variety of items, there has been a need for some time to update the Public Parks and Recreation category since the Commercial Recreation is not assigned to any specific site. As to the Public Parks and Recreation, below are some suggestions to update the category with different uses which are customary to parks and/or recreation spaces all over the City. Please me know if you have any questions or comments. Thanks Iris Public Parks and Recreation The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve open space and green spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere with the preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park. This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and cultural uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See related Policy PR- 2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses shall be permitted including but not limited to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, playgrounds, canoe trails and launches, small concession stands, restrooms, gyms, swimming pools, athletic fields, cultural facilities, marine and marina facilities and other facilities supporting passive and active recreational and cultural uses. Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for commercial photography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only when it is determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger significant environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.] MODIFIED PROPOSED LANGUAGE Public Parks and Recreation The primary intent of this land use classification is to conserve open space and green spaces of a park while allowing access and uses which will not interfere with the preservation of any significant environmental features which may exist within the park. This land use designation allows only open space and park uses with recreational and cultural uses where the total building footprints and impervious parking area surfaces in parks of one (1) acre of more may cover no more than 25% of the park land area (See related Policy PR- 2.1.3.). Both passive and active recreational uses shall be permitted including but not limited to nature trails, interpretive centers, picnic areas, park shelters, event spaces, pet areas,, playgrounds, canoe, kayak, and other recreational sport trails and launches, small concession stands, restrooms, indoor and outdoor gyms, swimming pools, athletic fields, cultural facilities, marine and marina facilities, office, community centers, government facilities, and other facilities supporting passive and active recreational and cultural uses. Lands under this designation with specific qualities that make them desirable for commercial photography shall be allowed to be used in this manner conditionally, and only when it is determined that conducting such commercial photography will not endanger significant environmental features within the area. [Added 3/23/99 by Ordinance 11782.] |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 53 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Unmet housing needs
o Education component in mixed use – 2
o Not enough schools
o 11 schools in South of D2
o 25 years ago
o Start career
o Leave town
o Empty nesters
o Move back
o Cycle has now changed
o West Grove – 1
o priced out
o Affordability
o Mutual neighborhood support
o Co-ops
o City wide issue that has been exacerbated
o Income restricted house
o Affordable is not necessarily affordable
o DDA -> additional tax
o Remove DDA to divert tax dollars to affordable housing
o Flooding near waterfront
o Issue of resilience
o Granting XX for the future
o Focus more on granular
o Neighborhood - focus on interest
o Different solutions
o Cohesion of neighborhoods
o Neglected neighborhoods
o Yes – Downtown, River
o Homelessness
o Downtown – 600 homeless -> highly concentrated
o West Grove -
o Residents becoming priced out
o Shotgun homes being removed
o Character is being lost
o Grove is not affected |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy HO-1.1.8
Policy HO-1.2.3
Policy HO-1.2.4
Policy HO-1.4.6
Objective HO-1.4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4 |
| 54 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
o Moved from Broward to Edgewater in 91’ and it was a very bad are because of the “cocaine cowboys” (Pablo Escobar)
o Lots of development and when you replace single-family homes w/ massive towers, there are not enough resources to accommodate the new residents
o Citizens want to be close to downtown but traffic is high
o Would like to move to other areas but it s too expensive to move anywhere
o Brickell has no greenspace, there are no places to walk, take your dog, need more greenspace
o For whole district, its too built up
o Streets are turn up
o Streets flood frequently and sea-level rise place a part
o Police can’t respond in time
o Does not seem that the city has caught up w/ development
o Holes on 27th and Biscayne are a hazard to kids in area
o Residents are experiencing rent hikes of up to 50% since covid-19
o Baywalk is a low hanging fruit
o Extend Metromover to other areas and neighborhoods for connectivity
o Downtown is neglected when it comes to cleanliness and code enforcement
o No shade trees
o Even near the Porsche tower there is a problem w/ cleanliness
o Other cities have scooters + bicycle lanes |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.1.6
Objective SS-2.1
Policy SS-2.1.1
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy CM-6.1.5
Policy LU-4.1.2
Goal LU-5
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.5
Policy TR-2.3.2
Policy TR-2.9.2
Policy PR-3.2.1 |
| 55 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
General Notes
o District 2 neighborhoods along waterfront have taken on their own identities, each attracting a different tenant
o All are unique in that they’re very expensive
o Cost has affected quality of life as rent has gone up 50% since 2020 and many must relocate
o In Edgewater if you’ve lived there 10 years, biggest impact is when a couple houses are replaced by something with 400 people you multiply traffic impacts by 1000%
o Infrastructure is now lacking: streets are crumbling, police can’t respond in time, storm drains aren’t working
o Nothing is going to be “affordable”: the best outcome would be to create the strongest mix of amenities and uses in D2 districts so the entire city can enjoy what the neighborhood has to offer (e.g. restaurants/bars, waterfront access, views)
o Connect the Edgewater/Grove neighborhoods to those further west with transit, bike/ped lanes, shade trees for walking
o People don’t like that parts of downtown are still neglected – owners not maintaining property, |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy CI-1.2.2
Policy CI-1.2.3
Policy SS-2.1.1
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.1.11
Policy LU-1.4.9
Policy NR-3.2.2
Policy NR-3.2.3
Goal LU-1
Goal LU-1.1.7 |
| 56 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o South D2 – through traffic is big issue
o Poor infrastructure – from 50’s & 60’s
o A lot of congestion
o Events exacerbate the issue
o May be done by police as a safety aspect
o Construction as well
o Strategy for Uber & Lyft vehicles
o Public transportation – mixed opinion
o South D2 – communication
o Apps are behind – technology not as accessible
o More access points
o Walking and Biking
o High demand
o Bike-to-school /walk-to-school
o Lots of opportunity to improve upon in the city
o Bayshore drive is the worst - bad design &
o Bad design & flow through traffic
o Downtown functionality -> $2 million allocated
o Network is not well connected
o Aspire for Bogota, Colombia
o True dedicated bike lanes with incorporation of safety barriers
o Atlanta – Beltline sold as economic development driver
o Venetian Causeway – issue
o Masterplan for neighborhood - Downtown |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-5.1.11
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.9.4
Policy TR-2.9.8
Policy TR-2.9.10 |
| 57 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Bicycle lanes needed because right now they are using sidewalks
o Need more public transit because it is too difficult to get between Edgewater and Coconut Grove
o In summer there is a lot less traffic. Is there a way to improve the school bus systems to decrease traffic?
o People use their cars because public transit does not connect them to where they need to go and it is unreliable
o A lot of investors in the area buying real estate rather than actual residents
o Downtown Metromover is extremely helpful for getting around downtown
o Not worth it to commute (to) other places because of traffic
o Ultra, Art Basel and other events make traffic even worse
o The city has made empty promises about expanding the Metromover and Metrorail
o Public transit like Metromover has to be close enough to walk to or provide viable bike option to get to station
o Underline should be expanded to help northern part of district commute and enjoy a park
o With covid a lot of people moved from NY to Miami because property was cheaper than in NY but at the expense of current residents
o Everyone uses Metromover but it is not designed to be efficient. The last station in Metromover is the school board but no one goes there
o North and south intermodal transportation is good but east-west connection is needed |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.4.4 |
| 58 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Metromover is the top transport amenity in D2
o If you can locate your home and job on the Metromover, don’t need a car
o Best project would be to extend/expand stations
o Bay Walk/Biscayne Line is most important project: would elevate Miami to world class pedestrian city
o Any multimodal east/west connection would change everything: people don’t visit friends that move west because no transit options
o Lacks a thought-out multimodal network: transit goes places that look good on the map e.g. education center
o Need to “funnel” multimodal into E/W corridors
o TOD policy has been effective and helps Miami “back into” real urban development near activity centers |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-2.1.2
Policy TR-2.1.7
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.2.3 |
| 59 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Ample park space but quality is lacking
o A lot of parks are not true green spaces
o Used for entertainment/event purposes
o Not enough pickleball courts & water stations
o A true community center with existing parks
o Shenandoah park is great example but took too long
o Lack of tree canopy Maurice Ferre Park
o 8 degree difference with shade |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-4.1.1
Policy NR-1.4.2
Objective PR-2.2 |
| 60 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Virginia Key is included but there is a giant waste facility
o Margaret Pace Park is a great park but there is no park ranger
o If there is a park, there is no parking or they are closed (Bayfront Park)
o Bayfront designed for events, not for residents
o Do not have access to Simpson Park and people do not know that it is there
o Staffing issues
o More people are using parks since Covid
o We are below the acreage
o I-395 big central park for city
o Parks master plan for city of Miami will be coming out soon ��
o Virginia Key bridge is extremely dangerous to bike on
o Virginia Key needs an update and beach improvements; thankfully wastewater treatment plant will be decommissioned in 2024 (???) |
Acknowledged |
| 61 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Disconnect between what parks offer and what users want
o Margaret Pace: so many facilities but not used
o Albert Pallot: no parking
o Bayfront: so many events no one goes there
o Perception that Kennedy Park improvements would take away from another park |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-4.1.1
Goal PR-4 |
| 62 |
Table 1 |
Table 1 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Perception of Miami as a place for employment
o Gateway city
o High concentration of small businesses
o No big corporations that are feeding back to the city
o Tech companies coming in but
o Will they be hiring local?
o Is the opportunity
o Where is the ladder for growth?
o Sea level rise -> is it an opportunity?
o Leverage educational assets to focus more on practical applications of resilience
o Funnel money (from impact fees) for education in resilience
o Allocate portion of city impact fees so that it stays within the districts
o Rehabilitation schools in city core
o Create a school in downtown
o Education – preservation
o Introduction of a low emission zone?
o Problems with people with less money
o Not as harsh as London
o Fixing existing Metromover
o May not be able to fix due to lack of provisions |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal EDU-2
Objective EDU-2.1
Policy EDU-2.1.1
Objective TR-1.2 |
| 63 |
Table 2 |
Table 2 |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Jobs in city of Miami are actually Miami-Dade jobs
o On service side, there are many jobs but not in other industries
o New district maps are supposed to have one financial corridor
o Little Haiti, Midtown, and other areas need investment |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.3.6
Policy LU-1.3.7
Policy LU-1.3.11 |
| 64 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
6/26/23 |
Virrick Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Mentality of riding the tide (new business, lots of jobs) raises all boats
o Perception of Miami as a job center but just in a couple places
o One effort of redistricting is to get at least one job corridor in every district
o Need to leverage growth across city into public improvements but be careful that impacts are also distributed evenly |
Acknowledged |
| 65 |
Ale |
N/A |
6/27/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Density
2. Traffic
3. Neighborhood identity |
Transportation |
Speeding and aggressive driving is a big issue |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-1.4.4 |
| 66 |
James |
Murley |
7/10/23 |
Miami River Commission Urban Infill Committee |
N/A |
Other |
We recommend striking Policies PA-3.4.1 and PA-3.4.2 because the city has not had the resources to conduct this reporting on an annual basis. Instead, how about replacing these with a policy to just do one report on the Working Waterfront to be provided every seven years? |
In compliance with the Stipulated Settlement Agreement, the referenced policies are no longer stricken. The City recommends keeping the policies in place with annual reporting. |
| 67 |
Kyle |
Merville |
7/17/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
More density in more places - especially higher density around transit. We need more homes for more people to meet the high demand. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-4.1.2
Policy LU-4.1.3
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11 |
| 68 |
Gloria |
Romero Roses |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
reducing heat island effect by investing in "green" infrastructure that can double for dispersing flood waters (i.e. linear parks, pocket parks). We need to increase housing options and public transit so young professionals, service workers can afford to live here without a car and rent that is affordable. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-4.1.2
Policy LU-5.1.1
Policy HO-1.1.2
Objective NR-1.4 |
| 69 |
Raisa |
Fernandez |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
Parks & Recreation |
I want a cleaner miami and more interacactive community. I also would like more green area and parks for our community. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-6
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-2.1.1
Objective SW-1.3
Goal SW-2 |
| 70 |
Clarice |
Cooper |
7/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
Good afternoon: I just submitted the final Zoom question during the just-finished Community Meeting, and am very concerned about my community having the opportunity to provide more input to this plan. West Grove is a neighborhood under siege and is beset with major problems, such as gentrification, lack of available affordable housing, displacement of tenants by investors/developers, and almost nonexistent commercial corridors. What is recommended is a sit-down, brainstorming session with the major stakeholders in the community to determine the most critical concerns and what could be done as remedies. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Clarice Cooper, President Coconut Grove Village West Homeowners and Tenants Association (HOATA) |
The Planning Department scheduled Community Meetings city-wide and in each Commission District. All information is posted on the website. The MCNP EAR includes focus areas of Housing and Neighborhoods, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and Economy. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 . |
| 71 |
Raissa |
N/A |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Education |
Economy
Parks & Recreation |
The City of Miami should be investing money to create a city that has good schools within its boundary. It should be working to have parks, open spaces, sidewalks, trash bins, services and marine infustructure that is serviced and maintained to the best of abilities. We should have investment in more natural and environmentally friendly development. We should preserve as much buildings and repurpose them instead of demolition. We should also have some free parking days throughout the year to promote local businesses and community events. We should work with the all partners to finish the commercial spaces underneath the parking lots of the Marlins Ballpark to really put the initial plan of creating an economic and fun neighborhood place to live and have fun. We should add some small dog parks within our neighborhoods. Every district and neighborhoods should have dog parks because it is an amenity that all residents and taxpayers would like to have. The city should also create more full-time jobs so we can create a more dedicated job force within our city services. Part time jobs are not always a good investment and should be reconsidered. Good paying and good benefit city jobs will create a sustainable workforce within our city government. I would like to see the Miami Marine Stadium and Virginia Key preserved and renovated as a nature park and include camping grounds and lots of eco-friendly adventures. I believe Miami has the potential to be great but our priorities should focus more on social services, jobs and education investments. It should also be linked to a progressive and environmental vision to include climate resilience so we can withstand an impact of large scale. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.3
Policy EDU-1.1.8
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2 |
| 72 |
Elizabeth |
Schultz |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coverage |
Transportation |
My children bike to school every day and I fear for their lives. The bike and pedestrian trail need to be safer and more extensive. With ongoing construction and worsening traffic the danger continues to mount. With this construction comes further destruction of our tree canopy. Critical to help to cool our neighborhoods and to help combat climate change. We are likely to leave Miami due to our concerns about the destruction likely due to climate change and the change in the neighborhoods where developers are allowed to clear lots and build to the lot lines. A concrete jungle is not too far in our future. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-2.3.3
Policy TR-2.4.3
Policy EDU-1.4.4 |
| 73 |
Gary |
Simon |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coverage |
Transportation |
I am an avid cyclist. A shared use path along S. Bayshore Dr. should not be installed. There should be separate bike lanes going each way. There are so many cyclists using S. Bayshore Dr. that they shared use path would be a waste. I have ridden on mini bike lanes and many shared use paths. I have experienced the difference And know that in certain areas a shared use path makes sense, but not along S. Bayshore Dr. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.3.3
Policy TR-2.4.4
Objective TR-2.9 |
| 74 |
Stephen |
Parr |
7/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Natural resource conservation |
Transportation |
Increase pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.4.4
Policy TR-2.3.3
Policy TR-2.9.4
Policy TR-2.9.11 |
| 75 |
Michelle |
Ortiz |
7/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Green & open spaces |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Housing affordability also needs to be addressed |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Goal HO-1 |
| 76 |
Pedro |
N/A |
7/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
Ethics, corruption, self-dealing, etc related to elected & other public officials. Responsible growth. Stop rubber stamping development. Infrastructure needsto keep up with development. Require greater investment from investors/developers for infrastructure to support their developments (waste management, waste water, traffic, public transportation, etc). More workforce & affordable housing. Improve garbage collection (streets) in lower income areas. Climate change (root causes -carbon emissions) and green spaces. More parks programs for families (after school care, tutoring, etc). Public transportation. |
Acknowledged |
| 77 |
Luiz |
Lann |
7/26/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coveragfe |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Improving walkability will improve air quality and sound pollution. It will also enable more 3rd places, which are critical for democracy and thriving communities. Land-use around the river and the bay should prioritize ecosystems, more natural edges, and provide habitat for native species. Make affordable housing mandatory, retrofit offices for housing, prohibit corporate ownership of housing, prohibit individual ownership of more than 3 homes. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective NR-1.4
Policy NR-1.4.4
Objective NR-1.3
Policy NR-1.1.6 |
| 78 |
Allan |
Avila |
8/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
More trees, better mass transit and control the rent |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.7
Policy LU-5.1.11
Objective LU-7.1
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy NR-1.4.4
Goal TR-1
Policy TR-1.2.9
Policy TR-2.1.2
Policy TR-2.2.3 |
| 79 |
Clara |
Garcia |
8/22/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Historic preservation
3. Neighborhood identity |
Economy |
Modification to MNCP, The first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami was Coconut Grove. Include the NCD-2, “Appendix A” in the Full Format for Land Commercial Mix-Use, height, setbacks and density exceptions as written in the Appendix A. This forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program and support the developer that want to offer help and bonus to the community. Must be part of the conservative interest of the city to keep their culture, heritage and the first cultural Caracter ( Coconut Grove) in Miami. Needs attention This community have been forgotten. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 80 |
Clara |
Garcia |
8/24/23 |
email |
N/A |
Economy |
Include Land Use Mix‐Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP must Include the commercial on Land Use " Mix‐Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD‐2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix‐Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 81 |
Mario |
Soto |
8/24/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Historic preservation
3. Neighborhood identity |
Economy |
Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 82 |
Esteban |
Hornick |
8/24/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Commerce, economy and job opportunities |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
My name is Esteban Hornick, local business owner. For years now, the City 's policies and politics have often done more harm than good for residents and local businesses. With Envision 2035, I'm pleased to see real goals and objectives to move Miami in the right direction. Specifically, planning for development around future transit stations - like the Wynwood Station - and putting the right kind of density in place so that there are people on the street supporting local shops as they walk to and from these train stations. This is the future. This has guts. This makes sense. And this is ... good for business. Thank you for taking my comments. God Bless. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 83 |
Mario |
Soto |
8/24/23 |
email |
N/A |
Economy |
Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the “Appendix A”. The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) Sincerely Mario Soto Architect Soto & Garcia Associates, LLC |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 84 |
Edward |
Martos |
8/28/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Good afternoon Lakisha, Sevanne, and David, I hope all’s well. During the EAR process, have you considered allowing Density Averaging, i.e., allowing units to be built across a development site with split FLUM designations? I think this simple concept can create a lot of flexibility.An additional change might be needed to Miami 21 Section 3.3.1 to make Density Averaging truly helpful but the EAR change would be a start. Here’s what Miami-Dade County’s CDMP says about Density Averaging. Density Averaging. The land use density ceiling designated on the LUP map will apply to every parcel of land. However, in certain instances, the averaging of density may be authorized among different parcels. Specific provisions for this to occur are specified below. All of the following allowances are limited to lands located within the Urban Development Boundary, which are designated for urban uses. Where groups of parcels under a single ownership or multiple ownerships that are legally unified (hereinafter legally unified development) are located within a unit area bounded by Major or Minor Roadways as indicated on the Land Use Plan map, portions of the unified development may be developed at densities higher than that shown on the LUP map provided that other portions are developed at correspondingly lower densities so that the average density of the entire development does not exceed the maximum gross density limits shown on the LUP map. Where a parcel or group of contiguous parcels under a single ownership or legally unified development has two different LUP map residential designations, the number of units permitted under one designation may be averaged with the number of units permitted under the other and developed at varying densities providing that the total number of units built on such property does not exceed the total number permitted under the two designations. Further, where 50 percent or more of the boundary of a parcel or group of contiguous parcels, not exceeding 20 acres in size, adjoins land that is developed or zoned for densities that are higher than those which are shown on the LUP map, such property may be zoned for a density higher than that shown on the LUP map but not higher than the highest density which is permitted by zoning on the adjoining properties. Density may be transferred across a Major or Minor roadway to an adjacent and legally unified parcel or portion thereof contiguous to the Roadway provided, further, that the site receiving the increased density shall be developed at a density no greater than the higher of adjoining or adjacent existing residential development or zoning, or if the adjoining land is undeveloped and not zoned for urban use, one density category higher than the LUP map designation of the parcel. The above provisions, however, are all conditioned upon a determination being made that the requested density and housing types are compatible with the surrounding development and would not create a significant negative impact on services within the area. The land use and residential density patterns indicated for municipalities represent the development basis that Miami-Dade County will use to plan and program public facilities and services that are its responsibility. The patterns of land use and densities indicated along municipal boundaries also seek to minimize conflicts between different jurisdictions. Because municipal planning agencies possess greater familiarity and the authority to plan land use of their jurisdiction, adopted municipal comprehensive plans may average densities among different density categories indicated on the LUP map, within unit areas bounded by Major and Minor Roadways indicated on the Land Use Plan map. However, the total potential number of dwelling units and acreage of other land uses should not be changed from the total indicated by the County plan for the unit area bounded by these roadways. Moreover, maintenance of compatible uses and housing types at local government jurisdictional boundaries is particularly important. I’m not writing on behalf of any particular client now. I’m just digesting the proposed changes and thought I’d propose this as an observer. EDWARD MARTOS PARTNER |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 85 |
Manuela |
N/A |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Tree coverage
2. Traffic
3. Education |
Transportation |
Have a good Public School. the intersection that is at 8th street and Brickell avenue, there should be a bridge for pedestrians to cross over and not across the street, to expedite traffic. Trying to turn left on 8th street towards the brickell key bridge is impossible, there is little time for it. |
The MCNP EAR includes Intergovernmental and Transportation Elements which support ongoing multi-agency coordination on infrastructure projects. |
| 86 |
Denisse |
Medina |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Tree coverage
2. Traffic
3. Parks & recreation |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Parks & Recreation |
Miami need more greenery. And need to stop building up. Can a city have a maximum amount of housing? |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.8
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2 |
| 87 |
Britta |
Aragon |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Traffic
2. Education
3. Green & open spaces |
Parks & Recreation |
The K-12 school options are very limited—need to move to accommodate my children’s education. Additionally, family friendly parks are almost nonexistent. All parks have homelessness issues, not enough playground equipment, not enough shade. It’s very hard to justify the exorbitant cost of living in Brickell when the public amenities are so sparing for families. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.8
Objective HO-1.4
Policy HO-1.4.3
Objective NR-1.4
Policy NR-1.4.1 |
| 88 |
Gi |
N/A |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Traffic
3. Green & open spaces |
Economy |
please, do something with/for the homeless |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective HO-1.4
Policy HO-1.4.1
Policy HO-1.4.7
Policy HO-1.4.8 |
| 89 |
Steve |
Michaels |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Traffic
3. Education |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Parks & Recreation
Transportation |
There needs to be more traffic lights on brickell bay drive as people use it as a speedway. There are so many ultra luxury buildings being constructed and not enough workforce housing. Middle class is being hurt the most because we are not eligible for rental relief assistance but still are living paycheck to paycheck as we are at the mercy of greedy landlords. Metro mover needs updating/to be more reliable and elevators need to work so that people can actually use the system versus driving everywhere. Need better educational institutions and more family amenities. Take notes from Chicago and their public amenities/parks and public spaces. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy HO-1.1.2
Policy HO-1.1.6
Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.8
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.1.7
Policy LU-4.1.2 |
| 90 |
Megan |
N/A |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
The thing that worries me the most about Miami is infrastructure issues like trash, water, traffic/roads, lack of diversity in options for transit, and lack of housing options |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Objective LU-4.1
Goal LU-5
Objective SW-1.3
Goal SW-2 |
| 91 |
Sabrina |
N/A |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Traffic |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Infrastructure and more public transportation options are immediate needs and housing options so we don’t become san francisco |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-5.1.7
Policy TR-2.2.3 |
| 92 |
Gary |
Wong |
8/30/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
To whom it may concern, I’d like to join the mailing list for this forum, my partner Andres and I purchased in 2016 HYDE MIDTOWN MIAMI.We are 100% residents since 2018 when our building was finally completed and have seen our community explode.We are very happy with all the exciting development in and around this neighborhood however, with growth comes some growing pains, we come from a large metro city that had some of these components under control such as parking and traffic. We’d like to comment on all the amazing things we’ve seen here since 2018 but also need to regarding some of the hazards that this new resolution may bring forth.Updating the elements based on changes in local conditions since 2015 by amending the future land use and residential density will have major infrastructure issues to this district if traffic and parking are not seriously taken into consideration.We look forward to the hearing and a solution moving forward.Thank you for your time and consideration! Respectfully, Gary Wong /Realtor® |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.7
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-2.2.10 |
| 93 |
Seth |
Goldberg |
8/30/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi Ryan, I appreciate you allowing me this opportunity to voice my concerns about the proposed amendment to Ordinance #10544. My name is Seth Goldberg. I own Unit 1508 at The Hyde Midtown (121 NE 34th St / Midtown 3). I bought pre-construction from The Related Group and moved in when the building opened in 2018. The appeal of Midtown Miami was simple to this former New Yorker. It’s a small city feel with livable traffic but not the over build of an area like Brickell. The folks at Related pitched that the bordering neighborhood, bounded by NE 36th Street to the North, Biscayne to the East, and East Coast Avenue to its West (a portion of your proposed Northeast RDIA) would not clutter the landscape or congest traffic given the 150 unit/acre limit for residential buildings. That has effectively created an artificial top of about 7 or 8 stories to buildings built on those parcels and kept the local population stable. That’s why I bought my unit and made a high six figure investment. Meanwhile, the most frustrating intersection in Miami abuts the most northern point of your proposed Northeast RDIA (36th street where it meets NE 2nd & Federal Hwy). On a daily basis, it’s a scene out of Mad Max with every driver fighting to get into the one middle lane that feeds over to the Julia Tuttle. The losers get backed up into the intersection, sometimes all the way back to the railroad tracks. Scary stuff. I doubt that this intersection could have predicted the current local population and its needs. It is definitely not equipped to manage a population surge. NE2nd Ave, which I see directly below my apartment … and which feeds into the aforementioned intersection, has cars backed up a quarter of a mile most afternoons around rush hour. We do not need any more congestion in the area. (See pic below: 3:15pm 8/29/03). What concerns me about what is now being proposed for the Northeast RDIA is that it would increase the limit on residential units/acre to 350 from the current 150, effectively green lighting residential buildings, with standard sized units, to be built up to est. 20 floors. That would add stress (and more danger) to the road system, add time to get to the Julia Tuttle Bridge, and would destroy the views of all owners who bought on the promise that there would be a limit to the size of dwellings on that stretch of land. Appreciating that you may want to add residential capacity near the intersection of N. Miami and 29th St, could efforts be made to incentivize the development of property to the South of Midtown or to its West? It would revitalize neglected neighborhoods, not block any views, and provide easy access to public transportation that may be added to that area. It would also be a safe distance from the Bay as planners consider rising water levels. Perhaps, as a compromise to the current plan, could we keep the cap at 150 units/acre for that portion of the proposed Northeast RDIA north of 29th Street, but amend it for the area south of it? North of 29th we should prioritize improving the infrastructure to accommodate the present needs, welfare, and safety of current residents.Thank you for considering my opinions and concerns. Regards, Seth Goldberg |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy LU-1.1.10
Policy LU-1.1.19
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.1
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.7
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy TR-1.7.5
Policy TR-2.2.10
Policy PR-1.1.2
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 94 |
Krizi |
Padilla |
8/30/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Sea level rise & climate change |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Affordable housing is scarce |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 95 |
Spencer |
Crowley |
8/30/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Healthy marine industry exists and is needed in south florida. the industry supports high wage jobs and a diversified workforce and supports recreational boating which is extremely important for the city’s residents and businesses. in south florida, healthy marine industrial areas exist on the dania cut-off canal, south forth of the new river, riviera beach waterfront, st lucie river, ft. pierce, manatee pocket, etc. The point of my comments at the MRC is that the existing language is not adequate to promote a healthy marine industry on the miami river. The language may be helpful in preventing conversion of the property to residential, and that is certainly a good and important first step, but there are other government regulations which inhibit the marine industry from existing and thriving here. If the city actually wants to do something to help support the industry, then it should be willing to step in and support its comp plan and the businesses that depend on it, when these other governmental regulations inhibit marine industry. the first comment I made would help ensure that the city does this in the future, either through the intergovernmental dispute act (as I had suggested) or the intergovernmental coordination element of the comp plan (as was mentioned on the call). Your comments below seem to suggest that no change should be made, and instead that the general provisions of the intergovernmental governmental coordination elements are sufficient. I do not agree with that and I believe it is inadequate. At aminimum it should be specified that the city would use its intergovernmental coordination provision of the comp plan when other governmental agencies interfere with the city comp plan provisions.
Similarly, the change of reporting from one year to seven years is a further erosion of an already weak element of the plan. if the city actually wanted to do something, it would change the scope of the reporting to be a full accounting of the “usefulness” of all category A properties (as measured by BTRs, MOPs, property tax valuation, property tax revenue, jobs, etc). that way the city can annually track the success or failure of its compl plan GOPs, and the marine industries which depend on it, and act in a somewhat timely fashion if trends suggest the industry is faltering, by for example, taking measures to incentivize, support or recruit suitable business.
If the city does not really care about the marine industry, but instead wants to maintain the status quo (which may prevent residential conversion, but will continue to artificially devalue property, resulting in a loss of jobs and tax revenue for the city), then the existing language will be sufficient. I am happy to discuss this further anytime you all are available. spencer |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy PA-3.4.1
Policy PA-3.4.2 |
| 96 |
Anna |
Yabloch |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Green & open spaces |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Public transportation!!!! We need better ways of getting around. And affordable housing. Rent is insane. Traffic is a nightmare. Please take care of the bikers, the loud cars, and racers. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal HO-1
Objective TR-2.2
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.2.5 |
| 97 |
Vic |
N |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
2. Tree coverage
3. Neighborhood identity |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
Stop gentrification |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Goal LU-5 |
| 98 |
Francisco |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| 99 |
Robert |
Viviano |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Parks & recreation |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| 100 |
Lillian |
Blondet |
8/31/23 |
email |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
Good afternoon, I was looking at the comprehensive plan display in the lobby and noticed that it include the future land use for each district. I was kind of surprised (as a resident) that the future land use for Parks is extremely low in all the districts. The highest amount I believe was 3%. Regards, Lillian P. Blondet Director, Office of Grants Administration City of Miami |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan which is included in the MCNP EAR. Objective PR-1.3 encourages the promotion of expansion of parks and recreation space throughout the City. |
| 101 |
LR |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Commerce, economy & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Economy |
Safety. It's no longer safe to live in Miami. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.1.4
Policy LU-1.6.10
Policy LU-1.8.2
Policy LU-6.2.3
Goal HO-1
Policy HO-1.2.8
Policy HO-1.2.10
Goal PW-1
Objective PW-1.2
Objective SW-1.1
Policy SW 1.1.7
Policy SW-1.2.5
Policy TR-1.2.3
Policy TR-1.5.1
Goal TR-2 |
| 102 |
Megan |
Brahimi |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Education |
Other |
They said Miami has so much potential but severely lacks education and infrastructure wise. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.3
Policy EDU-1.1.8
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2 |
| 103 |
Margaret |
Baird |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Density
2. Infrastructure
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
They are concerned about overbuilding with no infrastructure to support the growth. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 104 |
Guy |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
Development in the city seems to be approved without any reasonable thought as to infrastructure, logistics to support the increase in density and creating/maintaining green spaces for public health and to address the constant flooding |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 105 |
Maria |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Historic preservation
2. Parks & recreation
3. Neighborhood identity |
Other |
Stop turning everything to buildings with no design |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.3.14 |
| 106 |
Diana |
Becerra |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure |
Transportation |
More control shall be done to drivers as on a daily basis pedestrians are at risk of being killed. Cameras and fines will be a good way to enforce rules. Brickell needs better public school options. Insurance is also an important topic that the government needs to address. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.4.3
Objective EDU-1.1
Policy TR-1.4.3
Policy TR-2.8.2 |
| 107 |
Gabrielle |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Density
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Traffic |
Other |
Flooding |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.8.1
Policy LU-6.1.3
Objective CM-6.3
Objective SS-2.1
Policy SS-2.1.2 |
| 108 |
Igor |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coverage |
Transportation |
Do more for people, less for cars |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy NR-1.4.4
Policy TR-2.4.4 |
| 109 |
Gia |
Spargo |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coverage |
Other |
More shade, especially in downtown near the criminal courthouse etc. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy NR-1.4.4 |
| 110 |
Rolando |
N/A |
8/31/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Tree coverage
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
It is important to foment a greater feeling of neighborhood by having streets and locations which motivate citizens to go out and interact |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy PR-1.5.2
Policy PR-1.5.6
Objective PR-6.2
Policy PR-6.2.3 |
| 111 |
Diana |
Luft |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| 112 |
Andre |
Weiss |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
N/A |
I’m not that familiar |
N/A |
| 113 |
Henry |
Chou |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hello, My name is Henry Chou and I am the owner of unit #1005 at 121 ne 34th st, Miami, FL 33137. I tooagree with the positions and opinions set forth in Seth’s email to the Planning Board dated August 30th, 2023. (copy attached). Kind regards, Henry Chou **NOTE: The following text is pasted from the attached email** Hi Ryan, I appreciate you allowing me this opportunity to voice my concerns about the proposed amendment to Ordinance #10544. My name is Seth Goldberg. I own Unit 1508 at The Hyde Midtown (121 NE 34th St / Midtown 3). I bought pre-construction from The Related Group and moved in when the building opened in 2018. The appeal of Midtown Miami was simple to this former New Yorker. It’s a small city feel with livable traffic but not the over build of an area like Brickell. The folks at Related pitched that the bordering neighborhood, bounded by NE 36th Street to the North, Biscayne to the East, and East Coast Avenue to its West (a portion of your proposed Northeast RDIA) would not clutter the landscape or congest traffic given the 150 unit/acre limit for residential buildings. That has effectively created an artificial top of about 7 or 8 stories to buildings built on those parcels and kept the local population stable. That’s why I bought my unit and made a high six figure investment. Meanwhile, the most frustrating intersection in Miami abuts the most northern point of your proposed Northeast RDIA (36th street where it meets NE 2nd & Federal Hwy). On a daily basis, it’s a scene out of Mad Max with every driver fighting to get into the one middle lane that feeds over to the Julia Tuttle. The losers get backed up into the intersection, sometimes all the way back to the railroad tracks. Scary stuff. I doubt that this intersection could have predicted the current local population and its needs. It is definitely not equipped to manage a population surge. NE2nd Ave, which I see directly below my apartment … and which feeds into the aforementioned intersection, has cars backed up a quarter of a mile most afternoons around rush hour. We do not need any more congestion in the area. (See pic below: 3:15pm 8/29/03). What concerns me about what is now being proposed for the Northeast RDIA is that it would increase the limit on residential units/acre to 350 from the current 150, effectively green lighting residential buildings, with standard sized units, to be built up to est. 20 floors. That would add stress (and more danger) to the road system, add time to get to the Julia Tuttle Bridge, and would destroy the views of all owners who bought on the promise that there would be a limit to the size of dwellings on that stretch of land. Appreciating that you may want to add residential capacity near the intersection of N. Miami and 29th St, could efforts be made to incentivize the development of property to the South of Midtown or to its West? It would revitalize neglected neighborhoods, not block any views, and provide easy access to public transportation that may be added to that area. It would also be a safe distance from the Bay as planners consider rising water levels. Perhaps, as a compromise to the current plan, could we keep the cap at 150 units/acre for that portion of the proposed Northeast RDIA north of 29th Street, but amend it for the area south of it? North of 29th we should prioritize improving the infrastructure to accommodate the present needs, welfare, and safety of current residents.Thank you for considering my opinions and concerns. Regards, Seth Goldberg |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy LU-1.1.10
Policy LU-1.1.19
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.1
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.7
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy TR-1.7.5
Policy TR-2.2.10
Policy PR-1.1.2
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 114 |
Ana |
N/A |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Tree coveragfe |
Transportation |
If we want to get cars off the street, we need to make it feasible for residents to walk or bike around town. Aside from the lack of safety on our roads, tree coverage is essential. We have too much sun and asphalt which increases heat and discomfort and prohibits transitioning for most. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.4.4
Objective TR-2.9
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy NR-1.4.4
Policy EDU-1.4.4
Policy LU-5.1.11 |
| 115 |
Sinan |
Bozkurt |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Commissioner Christina King, I am an owner at Four Midtown and concerned that what little area we have for sunlight and fresh air would like its permit extended to 20 floors instead of the promised 5 floor rule. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice not. I bought expecting Midtown to follows its rules and zoning laws. Given that the other 3 (sold) new development projects have yet to start, and the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once, it makes little sense to increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first insure it can handle the current population and growth before approving such permits which are unwarranted and unnecessary at this point and time. The public deserves this re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? Sincerely, Sinan B. Bozkurt |
As part of the MNCP EAR process, the State of Florida requires for an analysis to ensure that housing meets the needs for population growth over the next 10 years. The Planning Department scheduled Community Meetings city-wide and in each Commission District. All information is posted on the website. The MCNP EAR includes focus areas of Housing and Neighborhoods, Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and Economy. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 . |
| 116 |
Christopher |
Penelas |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hi Lakisha and Sevanne, I hope all is well. Would you or someone in your office happen to have some time on Tuesday or Wednesday morning to discuss the interplay between the EAR amendments being proposed to PZAB on Wednesday and 29 & 31 NE 29th street’s comprehensive plan designation? Given the proposed Northeast RDIA and the fact that this is the only property in the area not included in any of the applicable overlay’s, we believe there may be an opportunity to include them in the Northeast RDIA and fill the gap. Let us know if you have any availability to discuss before Wednesday’s presentation. Best, Christopher A. Penelas |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 117 |
Benjamin |
Germain |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Other |
Drainage of water to prevent flooding |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal CM-6
Objective SS-2.1
Policy SS-2.1.1
Policy SS-2.1.2 |
| 118 |
Elina |
Cardet |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Increasing pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure |
Other |
Ecologically smart Coastal redesign and future technologies |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal CM-1
Policy CM-1.4.2
Policy CM-4.3.5
Goal CM-6
Policy CM-6.3.1 |
| 119 |
Paula |
De Carolis |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Traffic |
Parks & Recreation |
In would like to see shared uses, Interlocal agreements, and an environmental vision along with community gardens and projects that bring a community together of all ages. Increased government spending on salaries of staff that provide services to the community like tennis instruction or after school activities of quality to children. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy IC-1.1.1
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Goal LU-6
Goal PR-4
Goal PR-9
Policy PR-9.1.4 |
| 120 |
Justin |
N/A |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Green & open spaces |
Transportation |
Improved public transportation will reduce traffic along with Improved pedestrian and bicycle lanes. Reduced traffic means less pollution thus improving quality of life. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.4.4 |
| 121 |
Jose |
Tocasuche |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure |
Transportation
Housing & Neighborhoods
Parks & Recreation |
Miami needs more public transportation, more multi family dwellings, more green spaces and allow for more bicycle friendly roads. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.4.4
Objective TR-2.9
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.6 |
| 122 |
Katiana |
Walton |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Public right-of-way maintenance |
Transportation |
make metromover and trolley faster. homeless population... |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy HO-1.4.3
Policy HO-1.4.6
Policy HO-1.1.9
Objective HO-1.4
Policy HO-1.4.1
Policy HO-1.4.3 |
| 123 |
Lucelly |
Duenas |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Education
3. Green & open spaces |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Miami needs to figure out our housing issue, traffic issue, public transportation issue (unreliable, inefficient). Stop building on any available green space. Miami will be the next a Houston if we don’t stop over building. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-1.5.3 |
| 124 |
Mary |
N/A |
9/1/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Green & open spaces |
Other |
The biggest things need to be in conjunction with the county not duplicative or redundant |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal IC-1
Objective IC-1.1
Policy IC-2.1.1
Goal IC-3 |
| 125 |
Alex |
Chen |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hello- My name is Alex Chen. I am a condo owner of the Hyde building @ 121 NE 34th Street, unit 1808, miami. Iagree with the positions and opinions set forth in the email sentto to the Planning Board dated August 30th, 2023. (copy attached, sent by Seth Goldberg). I am very concerned about the proposed changes and how it would impact our living quality in the midtown Neighborhood. I sincerely ask that this new zoning is voted down due to the points shared in the attached letter. Regards, Alex Chen**NOTE: The following text is pasted from the attached email** Hi Ryan, I appreciate you allowing me this opportunity to voice my concerns about the proposed amendment to Ordinance #10544. My name is Seth Goldberg. I own Unit 1508 at The Hyde Midtown (121 NE 34th St / Midtown 3). I bought pre-construction from The Related Group and moved in when the building opened in 2018. The appeal of Midtown Miami was simple to this former New Yorker. It’s a small city feel with livable traffic but not the over build of an area like Brickell. The folks at Related pitched that the bordering neighborhood, bounded by NE 36th Street to the North, Biscayne to the East, and East Coast Avenue to its West (a portion of your proposed Northeast RDIA) would not clutter the landscape or congest traffic given the 150 unit/acre limit for residential buildings. That has effectively created an artificial top of about 7 or 8 stories to buildings built on those parcels and kept the local population stable. That’s why I bought my unit and made a high six figure investment. Meanwhile, the most frustrating intersection in Miami abuts the most northern point of your proposed Northeast RDIA (36th street where it meets NE 2nd & Federal Hwy). On a daily basis, it’s a scene out of Mad Max with every driver fighting to get into the one middle lane that feeds over to the Julia Tuttle. The losers get backed up into the intersection, sometimes all the way back to the railroad tracks. Scary stuff. I doubt that this intersection could have predicted the current local population and its needs. It is definitely not equipped to manage a population surge. NE2nd Ave, which I see directly below my apartment … and which feeds into the aforementioned intersection, has cars backed up a quarter of a mile most afternoons around rush hour. We do not need any more congestion in the area. (See pic below: 3:15pm 8/29/03). What concerns me about what is now being proposed for the Northeast RDIA is that it would increase the limit on residential units/acre to 350 from the current 150, effectively green lighting residential buildings, with standard sized units, to be built up to est. 20 floors. That would add stress (and more danger) to the road system, add time to get to the Julia Tuttle Bridge, and would destroy the views of all owners who bought on the promise that there would be a limit to the size of dwellings on that stretch of land. Appreciating that you may want to add residential capacity near the intersection of N. Miami and 29th St, could efforts be made to incentivize the development of property to the South of Midtown or to its West? It would revitalize neglected neighborhoods, not block any views, and provide easy access to public transportation that may be added to that area. It would also be a safe distance from the Bay as planners consider rising water levels. Perhaps, as a compromise to the current plan, could we keep the cap at 150 units/acre for that portion of the proposed Northeast RDIA north of 29th Street, but amend it for the area south of it? North of 29th we should prioritize improving the infrastructure to accommodate the present needs, welfare, and safety of current residents.Thank you for considering my opinions and concerns. Regards, Seth Goldberg |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy LU-1.1.10
Policy LU-1.1.19
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.1
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.7
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy TR-1.7.5
Policy TR-2.2.10
Policy PR-1.1.2
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. |
| 126 |
David |
Hanono |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Commissioner Christina King, I am an owner at Four Midtown and concerned that what little area we have for sunlight and fresh air would like its permit extended to 20 floors instead of the promised 5 floor rule. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice not. I bought expecting Midtown to follows its rules and zoning laws. Given that the other 3 (sold) new development projects have yet to start, and the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once, it makes little sense to increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first insure it can handle the current population and growth before approving such permits which are unwarranted and unnecessary at this point and time. The public deserves this re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? Sincerely, David |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 127 |
Sabrina |
Nunez |
9/1/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Commissioner Christina King, I am an owner at Four Midtown and concerned that what little area we have for sunlight and fresh air would like its permit extended to 20 floors instead of the promised 5 floor rule. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice not. I bought expecting Midtown to follows its rules and zoning laws. Given that the other 3 (sold) new development projects have yet to start, and the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once, it makes little sense to increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first insure it can handle the current population and growth before approving such permits which are unwarranted and unnecessary at this point and time. The public deserves this re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? Sincerely, Sabrina Nunez |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 128 |
Rebeca |
Arocho |
9/2/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Dear Commissioner Christina King, I am an owner at Four Midtown and concerned that what little area we have for sunlight and fresh air would like its permit extended to 20 floors instead of the promised 5 floor rule. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice not. I bought expecting Midtown to follows its rules and zoning laws. Given that the other 3 (sold) new development projects have yet to start, and the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once, it makes little sense to increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first insure it can handle the current population and growth before approving such permits which are unwarranted and unnecessary at this point and time. The public deserves this re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? We have HEAVY traffic congestion in midtown and constant backup of traffic flow. It is almost impossible to enter or leave the area. We pay assessments to the midtown miami CDD which does a horrible job of providing sidewalk painting, amenities, security or public spaces like dog parks. Recently we have a motorcycle gang running amok in the midtown area and rampant crime in a prestigious neighborhood. This district cannot handle more people and i would highly implore that the council and city a) Do not allow any increase in construction unit b) Do whatever it takes to stop construction in the central area between 34th street and 36h th street bounded by 1st ave and buena vista blvd. Any attempt to increase the allowable threshold of units/acre is a huge detriment to the residents and owners in midtown. We truly CANT handly any more residents in the area and jamming more units will highly affect the crime. walkability, traffic patterns and livability in a very negative manner. I implore the city to stop this greedy land grab from vested interests. Sincerely, Rebeca Arocho Midtown resident |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
Policy LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 129 |
Rohaan |
Khullar |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Green & open spaces |
Parks & Recreation |
Stop selling all the parks. |
Acknowledged |
| 130 |
Ana |
Gabriela |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Green & open spaces |
Parks & Recreation |
More dog parks in brickell!! City commissioners use the underline and have added toxic plants, covered the green spaces and decreased doggy relief area in a meighborhood where they have closed ALL dog parks when almost every resident has a dog/pet h |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
See also: Policy LU-3.1.2
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Goal PR-1
Policy PR-1.1.1
Policy PR-1.1.2 |
| 131 |
Anthony |
Hernandez |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Increase mass transit options
3. Education |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation
Economy |
More and better schools, less car traffic, more green spaces, more small businesses |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.8 (New)
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2
Policy TR-2.9.3
Policy TR-2.9.5
Goal PR-1
Objective PR-1.1
Policy PR-1.1.4 |
| 132 |
Chris |
N/A |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy & job opportunities
2. Education
3. Green & open spaces |
Parks & Recreation |
Increase the quality of schools and parks so that as my family grows we can stay in Miami and not move to an area with better schools and cleaner parks. Get rid of homeless. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective EDU-1.1
Policy EDU-1.1.8 (New)
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2
Policy TR-2.9.3
Policy TR-2.9.5
Goal PR-1
Objective PR-1.1
Policy PR-1.1.4 |
| 133 |
Steven |
Smith |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Traffic
3. Parks & recreation |
Transportation |
Traffic after downtown events must be managed better. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-1.2.7
Policy TR-1.2.8
Policy LU-1.1.11
Policy LU-5.1.11 |
| 134 |
Austin |
N/A |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Tree coverage
2. Traffic
3. Green & open spaces |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
I would like to see more space for parks. I am really worried about the future of traffic in Brickell |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.6
Policy LU-1.2.3
Policy LU-1.6.8
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.2.7
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.4.3 |
| 135 |
Melissa |
N/A |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
I’d like to keep affordable rates in Miami’s infrastructure, while diverting tax dollars into conservation of our eco system while developing eco friendly technology to further develop our infrastructure (which should result in more sustainable jobs and a better economy). |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal NR-1
Policy NR-1.2.2
Policy NR-1.2.5
Objective NR-1.3
Objective NR-1.4
Policy CI-1.1.2
Policy CI-1.1.11
Goal EDU-2 |
| 136 |
Astrid |
Colonelli |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Tree coverage
2. Parks & recreation
3. Green & open spaces |
Parks & Recreation |
Tibor Hollo Park has great infrastructure for babies but it is filthy, extrenely dirty |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective PR-2.2
Policy PR-2.2.5
Policy PR-5.1.2 |
| 137 |
Rick |
Luces |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Traffic |
Economy |
Resolve the Homeless Issue!!!!! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy HO-1.4.1
Policy HO-1.4.3
Policy HO-1.4.4
Policy HO-1.4.5
Policy HO-1.4.6
|
| 138 |
May |
N/A |
9/2/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Density
2. Traffic
3. Parks & recreation |
Parks & Recreation |
The parks are used as profit centers and not for the enjoyment of residents and visitors. If the city of Miami aspired to be become a world class city that it needs to have world classParks. |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 139 |
DMV |
N/A |
9/3/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hello to my fellow Miami residents and decision makers, I appreciate you allowing me this opportunity to voice my concerns about the proposed amendment to Ordinance #10544: 9/6/23 Public Zoning Meeting. I am an owner resident in 4 Midtown and I’m a registered voter. I want to voice my concerns over the proposed amendment to increase the limit on residential units/acre to 350 from the current 150. Critical issue: Once development starts on this parcel of land, there will be no greenspace in this entire area for the community to enjoy. What is the government doing to ensure that parks and outdoor spaces are available for our health and well-being? Could the city/district convert the abandoned, partially developed land at the corner of 29th & Miami Ave into a community park? We were able to “win” the battle against Wal-Mart (thankfully!), why not convert that space into a park? This is a critical need for the people of Miami and Midtown! Without it, people will not want to move to or remain in Midtown, this I can tell you is fact! There are already owners selling their condos now before the construction begins. It’s not simply because the selling prices are high. They are frustrated enough over significant traffic, crime and cleanliness issues… the elimination of the only greenspace in the vicinity will be devastating to the community! There are government funded programs to do just what we are asking: www.midtownmiamicdd.net/district-info.php And we pay a special tax for living in Midtown just for these services. I ask you, how is this group, and others that have the responsibility to protect the citizens in these exact situations, standing up for us?! Background: I bought from The Related Group and moved in 2013. The appeal of Midtown Miami was simple to this former Chicagoan. It’s a small city feel with livable traffic but not the over build of an area like Brickell. The folks at Related pitched that the bordering neighborhood, bounded by NE 36th Street to the North, Biscayne to the East, and East Coast Avenue to its West (a portion of your proposed Northeast RDIA) would not clutter the landscape or congest traffic given the 150 unit/acre limit for residential buildings. That has effectively created an artificial top of about 7 or 8 stories to buildings built on those parcels and kept the local population stable. That’s why I bought my unit and made a high six figure investment. Meanwhile, the most frustrating intersection in Miami abuts the most northern point of your proposed Northeast RDIA (36th street where it meets NE 2nd & Federal Hwy). On a daily basis, it’s a scene out of Mad Max with every driver fighting to get into the one middle lane that feeds over to the Julia Tuttle. The losers get backed up into the intersection, sometimes all the way back to the railroad tracks. Scary stuff. The foot traffic is constantly challenged by the motorists (including electric bikes, motorcycles, trollies, scooters, ATVs & the like) running through stop signs and redlights, just to advance the flow of traffic. It is clear the zoning department did not accurately predict the current local population and its needs. It is definitely not equipped to manage a more significant population surge. NE2nd Ave, which I see directly below my apartment … and which feeds into the aforementioned intersection, has cars backed up a quarter of a mile most afternoons around rush hour. We do not need any more congestion in the area. What concerns me about what is now being proposed for the Northeast RDIA is that it would increase the limit on residential units/acre to 350 from the current 150, effectively green lighting residential buildings, with standard sized units, to be built up to est. 20 floors. That would add stress (and more danger) to the road system and the pedestrians, add significantly more congestion and pollution, and would destroy the views of all owners who bought on the promise that there would be a limit to the size of dwellings on that stretch of land. Appreciating that you may want to add residential capacity near the intersection of N. Miami and 29th St, could efforts be made to incentivize the development of property to the Northwest of Midtown or to its West? It would revitalize neglected neighborhoods, not block any views, appropriately level out the congestion and provide easy access to public transportation that may be added to that area. It would also be a safe distance from the Bay as planners consider rising water levels. However, I must state... any attempt to increase the allowable threshold of units/acre is a huge detriment to the residents and owners in Midtown. We truly CAN'T support any more residents in the area and adding more units will highly affect the crime rates, walkability, traffic patterns and livability in a very negative manner. Finally, climate change effects, security and safety of the constituent homeowners have not even been addressed in my concerns outlined here, but they are significant and escalating in the immediate area. A group of us will be attending the hearing in person on 9/6/23. We would like to have our voices heard! I implore the city to stop and seriouslyconsider, not only the short term interests (investors), but the long term and lasting detrimental effects thatwill impact this vibrantneighborhood. Please, don't destroyit. It's not necessary! Thank you for considering my opinions and concerns, dmv |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
Policy PW-1.3.1
Policy CM-1.4.2
Policy CM-4.1.2
Goal CM-6
Policy LU-1.2.3
Policy LU-1.6.8
Goal LU-5 |
| 140 |
Ellen |
N/A |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Tree coverage |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
| 141 |
Oscar |
C |
9/5/23 |
email |
N/A |
Economy |
Include Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP must Include the commercial on Land Use " Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 142 |
Alina |
Castro |
9/5/23 |
email |
N/A |
Economy |
Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 143 |
Wendelin |
Weingartner |
9/5/23 |
email |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
Dear Commissioner Christina King, I am an owner at Four Midtown and concerned that what little area we have for sunlight and fresh air would like its permit extended to 20 floors instead of the promised 5 floor rule. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice not. I bought expecting Midtown to follows its rules and zoning laws. Given that the other 3 (sold) new development projects have yet to start, and the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once, it makes little sense to increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first insure it can handle the current population and growth before approving such permits which are unwarranted and unnecessary at this point and time. The public deserves this re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? Sincerely, Dr. Wendelin Weingartner, 4 Midtown PH1 |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 144 |
Oscar |
Garcia |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Commerce, economy and job opportunities |
Economy |
Include Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP must Include the commercial on Land Use " Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 145 |
Alina |
Castro |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Historic preservation
3. Neighborhood identity |
Economy |
Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 146 |
Franchesca |
N/A |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Neighborhood identity |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Parks & Recreation |
Plant trees in low income areas and provide more green spaces/parks, stop gentrification; we do not need a second brickell, multi family housing design that is authentic to the neighborhood and it’s identity |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.6
Objective LU-4.1
Goal LU-5 |
| 147 |
Daiana |
N/A |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Most importantly there needs to be more affordable housing. Some of us have lived in these neighborhoods all our lives and have experienced massive rent increases especially these past few years/months. We need affordable housing for our parents, children for our community. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.1
Policy HO-1.1.2
|
| 148 |
Michelle |
Rodriguez |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increase housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
I believe climate change and housing are top priority in communities across Miami. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Objective LU-6.1
Policy LU-6.1.1
Policy CM-6.4.2
Objective TR-1.2
Policy PR-9.1.4 |
| 149 |
Metzi |
Montes |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more affordable housing options for florida residents. Many are being forced to go elsewhere due to an increase in rent |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 150 |
Evelyn |
N/A |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options,
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Tree coverage |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Have alternatives for housing |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 151 |
Elisabeth |
N/A |
9/5/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Ensure urban infrastructure support working class communities. Housing, public transit, and climate change are major issues that will affect working class communities immensely. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Goal LU-5
Objective LU-6.1
Policy CM-6.4.2
Policy TR-2.2.3
Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.1
Policy HO-1.1.2 |
| 152 |
William |
Hopper |
9/5/23 |
Historic and Environmental Preservation Board Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
I am concerned about Policy LU-2.3.2 which states that the City shall seek to increase historic resources. It seems like you can get out of it. Maybe that policy should just say we should just do it. |
The comprehensive plan is a policy document. City Code and the zoning ordinance will regulate how historic resources are designated. |
| 153 |
William |
Hopper |
9/5/23 |
Historic and Environmental Preservation Board Meeting |
N/A |
Other |
I read the plan and I was concerned over the population projection. I was also concerned about the [low] rate of home ownership. I was also concerned about policies encouraging demolition of derelict buildings. However, my fears were qualmed as I read on to other policies in support of historic preservation, resilience, and sustainability. |
Acknowledged |
| 154 |
Gabriela |
Silva |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Public right-of-way maintenance |
N/A |
It's ok |
Acknowledged |
| 155 |
Mansoor |
Zakaria |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
Dear Commissioner Christina King and members of the Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board, I am an owner at Four Midtown (Unit LPH-2) and am very concernedabout the proposed amendment to Ordinance #10544 to extend the developers’ building permit to go from 5 floors to 20. Frankly, this isunconscionable. There is so little green space that construction of any new building in this space should be considered skeptically. It would ruin the open feel of the Midtown neighborhood, add to the existing traffic morass and reducethe area we have for sunlight and fresh air. In short, it would ruin the neighborhood. Please resist the permitting of residential buildings in Midtownthat seem to neglect consideration for parks, open air and infrastructure to support the traffic it generates. This is not the way tobuild great neighborhoods or make Miami a great city. As an owner I agree new developments should happen but changing the rules on property owners without notice is not right. As a regular voting citizen, I expect ourMidtown political leaders to follows its rules and zoning laws. Additionally, given that the other 3 new development projects have yet to start -with the neighborhood is not equipped to handle all these projects at once - , it makes little sense to approve any building let alone increasing this area to an even higher projected zone. Further, the infrastructure in Midtown is already weighed down and that's without the 3 upcoming buildings. The city should first ensure it can handle its current growth before approving permits that are not needed at this time.I am hopeful that you will prioritizecurrent tax paying citizens and home-owners and not disregard our legitimate concerns which are universally shared among Midtown owners and residents. The public deserves this project and the re-zoning to be put on hold until more information is shared with the public about how the city is handling current growth and future population growth. Whats the point of a taller building if the sewage can't drain or the power cannot stay on? I hope you will support the homeowners and citizens of Midtown. Sincerely, Mansoor Zakaria |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 156 |
Judith |
Anderson |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Greetings, Please vote “no”. Thank you, Judith Anderson |
Acknowledged |
| 157 |
Fernando |
Benito |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Good afternoon, Please note that I am NOT a lobbyist. I am a resident at the Ivy building, part of the Riverfront complex. I strongly oppose the rezoning proposal along Miami avenue to allow for more density in future developments. The area is already too dense, traffic is unbearable and we do not have sufficient public transportation as an alternative. Whenever there is any event at the Hyatt or at the Arena, the area is completely clogged and unusable. If further density is approved, this will become a living nightmare. Sincerely, Fernando Benito Moncada |
Acknowledged |
| 158 |
Henry |
Sanchez |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Good afternoon, I am writing to express my concern regarding the Re-zoning along Miami Avenue adjacent or close to the Miami Avenue bridge. I am against re-zoning this area in order to allow for greater density. As I live in Riverfront complex, I cannot see how the current infrastructure, resident safety in case of emergencies, and existing congestion can allow for a re-zoning to add more residents. Aside from the new buildings that have already been approved and will cause additional stress to current traffic challenges, Bayside and Bayfront events cause traffic to come to a complete stop when the Miami Avenue bridge is lifted. Having the ability for emergency vehicles to navigate through is a complete public hazard…not to mention the general public getting stuck. Please vote "no" on my behalf. Thank you, Henry Sanchez |
Acknowledged |
| 159 |
Pamela |
Medina |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Hi, my name is Pamela Medina and I live at 90 SW Third St, Apt 2806 Miami FL 33130 . I am against Re-zoning along Miami. Ave near Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. I am not a lobbyist. Please vote "no". |
Acknowledged |
| 160 |
Robert |
Hutt |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Proposed Amendment in front of the Miami Planning Board File ID 14395 - as it applies to the area generally bounded by NE 36th Street to the North, Biscayne Boulevard to the East and North East 20th Terrace etc. I am trying to attend the meeting planned for this evening @ 6:30pm but I wanted to send this to formally raise my concerns if I am unable to get there in time. My question is relatively simple – what is the driving need to increase the allowable housing population of a relatively small area by more than 200%? My concerns are (i.a.): i) There are already, at least 2,700 additional units already either in, or planned for, development in the proposed area ii) There are already, at least 2,225 additional already either in, or planned for, development adjacent to the proposed area iii) The existing infrastructure is starting to buckle under the weight of the increased traffic (both since Covid and with the population growth within Midtown and the surrounding areas. The proposed Roadway Improvements on NE 2nd Ave between 36th and 20th streets, presented in May of this year, will do nothing to relieve this but will simply complicate it. The existing developments will already exacerbate the problem and I do not see any solid proposition to cope with it in the documentation supporting this application. iv) Taller buildings will further obscure the outlook from any west or south west facing units already in place and, apart from detracting from the enjoyment of the owners, will reduce their sale/re-sale value. I have done some rudimentary research of my own (see attached Word document) – I did contact the planning department by phone and email but received nothing from them. Fortunately a colleague of mine provided a URL where the appendices to the application could be viewed. Regards Robert Hutt |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 161 |
Hossein |
Tavana |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Dear Planning Director: My name is Dr. Hossein Tavana and I live at 350 S Miami Ave #1110, Miami, FL 33130. I live in the Riverfront complex and I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against increasing density along the west side of S Miami Ave, north of the draw bridge. Brickell, even before developing all the lands envisioned in 2035, has reached a tipping point. We already have serious congestion problems and several new high density buildings are already approved. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the increasing population, let alone adding to already approved densities. We need more roadways, better traffic control systems, better sewage system, parks and schools and not higher density, for any reason it might be. I cordially urge you to vote “NO” to this amendment. Best regards, Hossein Tavana, PhD |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 162 |
Nicolas |
Neumann |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Nicolas Neumann and I live at 92 SW 3rd St. Apt 308 Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to the agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Rezoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. I live in a lower floor, and construction lights oftenare pointed at our building and my unit, it gets harder and harder to even fall asleep atnight. Please, I beg you, please vote "no". Nicolas Neumann |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 163 |
Tyler |
Eastridge |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Tyler Eastridge and I live at 350 S Miami Ave Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regard to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem, and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront Park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Best, Tyler Eastridge |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 164 |
Jayesh |
Patel |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Jayesh Patel and I live at 92 SW 3rd street Unit #4412, Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote NO! Thanks, Jayesh Patel |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 165 |
Zane |
Tavana |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Dear Planning Director: My name is Dr. Hossein Tavana and I live at 350 S Miami Ave #1110, Miami, FL 33130. I live in the Riverfront complex and I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against increasing density along the west side of S Miami Ave, north of the draw bridge. Brickell, even before developing all the lands envisioned in 2035, has reached a tipping point. We already have serious congestion problems and several new high density buildings are already approved. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the increasing population, let alone adding to already approved densities. We need more roadways, better traffic control systems, better sewage system, parks and schools and not higher density, for any reason it might be. I cordially urge you to vote “NO” to this amendment. Best regards, Hossein Tavana, PhD |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 166 |
Juan |
Outon |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hello,My name is Juan Outon and I live at 92 sW 3rd St. Apt 3510, Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 167 |
Jorge |
Primo |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Jorge Juan Primo Planta and I live at 92 SW 3rd St, Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 168 |
Andrea |
Baraybar |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, my name is Andrea Baraybar and I live at 92 SW 3rd St, #3906, Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against re-zoning along the Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront community and we already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved in close proximity. When there is an event at Bayfront Park, Kaseya Center or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop and there is no workaround: we cannot get home, emergency vehicles cannot get through, etc. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Sincerely, Andrea |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 169 |
Leticia |
Hoyle |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Leticia Hoyle and I own at 90 SW 3rd street Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Thank you, Leticia Hoyle |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 170 |
Daniel |
Zamora |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Daniel Zamora and I live at 90 SW 3rd St unit 2311 Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Regards, Daniel Zamora |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 171 |
Crystal |
Kaczkowski |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hello, My name is Crystal Kaczkowski and I own a condo at 350 S. Miami Ave, Apt 2002, miami FL 33101. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along the Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. In the Riverfront complex, there’s already a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or the Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. Emergency vehicles cannot get through, and we are stuck. The city is very dense as it is, and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. I am not a lobbyist. Please vote "no". Crystal Kaczkowski |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 172 |
Carlos |
Parra |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Commerce, economy and job opportunities |
Economy |
Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors for properties on Grand Ave. must be expressly incorporated into the Municipal Neighborhood Conservation Plan (MNCP). It is imperative that the MNCP comprehensively encompasses commercial properties within the 'Mix-Use Cultural Corridors' designation, specifically those situated along Grand Ave. Coconut Grove proudly stands as the inaugural Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD) in Miami, established with the primary objective of safeguarding the heritage, identity, and cultural essence of this vibrant community. Incorporation of NCD-2 into the Land Use Map of MNCP, in full accordance with the detailed provisions for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as outlined in 'Appendix A,' is mandated. This often-overlooked neighborhood warrants immediate attention and necessitates the implementation of a robust revitalization program. The City of Miami bears a distinct responsibility to afford special consideration for the preservation of the cultural, heritage, and character of Coconut Grove. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 173 |
Francisco |
Neri |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Sea level rise & climate change |
Economy |
Incorporate Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP should include the commercial on Land Use " Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 174 |
Miguel |
Pina |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Historic preservation |
Economy |
The City of Miami must dedicate special attention to preserving the culture, heritage, and cultural character of Coconut Grove. Coconut Grove, the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, was established to ensure the preservation of the community's heritage, identity, and culture. In the Land Use Map of MNCP, it is crucial to include NCD-2, following the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions stated in "Appendix A". Urgent attention and a revitalization program are needed for this forgotten neighborhood |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 175 |
Francisco |
Reyna |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Infrastructure |
Economy |
Include Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP must Include the commercial on Land Use " Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 176 |
Edward |
Martos |
9/6/23 |
email |
N/A |
Economy |
Good afternoon Lakisha, Sue and Ryan, As promised in my last email, I’m writing again to give you courtesy notice of a proposed amendment I intend to present at tonight’s PZAB meeting regarding the EAR Amendments. In this matter, my client is the owner of property in Coconut Grove. Her neighbors are considering joining the effort. They own lots fronting Grand Avenue and Washington Avenue. The properties are substandard lots and also part of NCD-2’s Market Village Subzone. Despite site constraints, my client has had huge success with a small mixed use building with ground floor commercial and two large residential units. My client and her neighbors would love to replicate that success and fulfill the longstanding promise of the NCD-2’s Market Village subzone. However, recent applications have been thwarted. The Zoning Administrator (copied) has noted that use and density limitations in the Comprehensive Plan don’t allow the existing development to be duplicated. Its my understanding that Lakisha has made a similar determination. Attached is a very simple proposal that would remedy this. I’ll be presenting this to the PZAB tonight and am writing to give you a heads up. Forgive me for not communicating sooner but I was hired only yesterday. I’ll see you tonight. All the best, EDWARD MARTOS PARTNER **NOTE: ATTACHMENT TITLED "Grand and Washington - Proposed EAR Amendment (as of 09-06-23).pdf" was attached to the email. This attchment proposed a text change to the interpretation of Duplex Residential. ** |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 177 |
Danny |
N/A |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure |
Transportation |
Make the city walkable! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.7
Policy LU-1.4.3
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.8
Policy LU-5.1.9
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.3.2 |
| 178 |
Jomarie |
Santiago |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
Cost of living which is including morgstws and rent, home owners insurance, and taxes must be lowered if we want maintain the community that has lived here. If not new out of tower es will replace is within the next 10 years. |
Acknowledged |
| 179 |
Mingli |
Yactayo |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Parks & recreation |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Instead of increasing housing options we should be focused on increasing AFFORDABLE housing options |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 180 |
Adrianna |
N/A |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
Please consider ALL citizens within this area. The POVERTY and HOMELESS is very highs and it needs to be addressed in order to move forward. The CLIMATE should be #1. Miami is a port and we will be UNDER WATER fairly soon. SAVE THE ANIMALS |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-6
Policy HO-1.4.3
Policy HO-1.4.6
Goal CM-6
Policy CM-6.4.1
Policy CM-6.4.2
Policy PR-9.1.4 |
| 181 |
Enrique |
Galavis |
9/6/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Other |
Schools should growth parallel to the people |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy EDU-1.1.6
Objective EDU-1.2
Policy EDU-1.2.3.2 |
| 182 |
Paul |
Mann |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
Asked why we are replacing will with shall. |
During the meeting, Principal Planner Ryan Shedd and Asst. City Attorney George Wysong answered Mann's question about legal preference for the word shall over will.
Basically, the two words mean the same thing; however, "shall" is more forceful. |
| 183 |
Juan Carlos |
Zapata |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
How will the City make sure proposed transit will actually be built and delivered so there isn't extra density that doesn't have adequate transit and infrastructure? |
During the meeting, there was a discussion back and forth between Board Member Zapata and Principal Planner Ryan Shedd about the SMART Plan.
In short, the City cannot make this guarantee; however, the proposed plan is recommended in concert with the SMART plan. |
| 184 |
Juan Carlos |
Zapata |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
Suggests developing timelines for capital improvements so they actually get built and don't get scrapped because of budgets. |
During the meeting, there was a discussion between Zapata, Shedd, and Steiner about OCI's budgeting practices and GOBs. |
| 185 |
Juan Carlos |
Zapata |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
It's bad policy to rely on another governmental entity to provide transit and to increase density on the premise the area will be serviced by future proposed transit solutions. The City should handle transit itself to avoid lost promises of the County. |
During the meeting, Sevanne Steiner discussed the City's proposed policies to create 15 minute neighborhoods and a 15 minute city so that people can get around in a multimodal manner withot only having to rely on the County's transit. |
| 186 |
Luis |
Rivera |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
President of Vizcaya HOA (that's what it sounded like). This is riduclous way to this because no one knew this was happening. No one was noticed, no one was invited to outreach meetings. District 3 was not included. Miami 21 did outreach right and this was not done right. |
District 1 and District 3 meetings were held after the 9/6/23 in response to the feedback on 9/18/2023 and 9/26/2023. In addition, there were two citywide meetings: 6/6/2023 and 7/19/2023. |
| 187 |
Yvonne |
Bayona |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
According to Commisisoner Carollo's chief of staff, the department did receive contacts for neighborhood associations and residents and the planning department just did nothing with that information. There was no outreach for District 3 or District 1. Even the website shows only outreach was done in Districts 2, 4, and 5. |
District 1 and District 3 meetings were held after the 9/6/23 in response to the feedback on 9/18/2023 and 9/26/2023. In addition, there were two citywide meetings: 6/6/2023 and 7/19/2023. |
| 188 |
Edward |
Martos |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Economy
Housing & Neighborhoods |
1. Representing clients owning property on Grand Ave in Coconut Grove. Miami 21 adopted the NCD-2 overlay in Appendix A which allows for mixed-use developments of some properties with Caribbean cultural architecture. MCNP does not allow this to happen because the properties' underlying FLU are Duplex Residential and Single Family Residential. Proposes language to tweak the MCNP so these properties can be developed the way Miami 21 intended as right now there is inconsistency between Miami 21 and MCNP.
2. Representing client owning 3600 Biscayne Blvd. This property should be included in the proposed Northeast RDIA. This property, if the Northeast RDIA were adopted, would be an island of inconsistent density and intensity with all the other properties around it.
3. Not representing any clients but proposing an idea to adopt density averaging which Miami-Dade County already allows. |
1. Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1
2. Acknowledged
3. Acknowledged |
| 189 |
Christopher |
Penelas |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Lawyer representing client who owns 29 NE 29 St requesting for this property to be included in the proposed Northeast RDIA. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 190 |
Darlene |
N/A |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Economy |
Advocating for tweaking the MCNP to allow for the strip of substandard lots on Grand Ave in Coconut Grove to be built the way Miami 21's NCD-2 overlay was created to facilitate. The FLUM does not let these properties develop the way Miami 21 prescribes them to. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 191 |
Clara |
Garcia |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Economy |
Asking all entities to take into consideration the inconsistency between Miami 21 and the FLUM for the strip of land on Grand Ave in Coconut Grove under Miami 21's NCD-2 overlay. |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 192 |
Chritine |
Michaels |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Object to moving the boundary of the existing River Quadrant RDIA. We do not need more density without plans to improve transportation. We need to reduce density. |
Acknowledged |
| 193 |
Seth |
Goldberg |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
Expressing partial opposition to the proposed amendments to MCNP. The traffic on NE 36th St is awful and this was identified in a 2007 study by Miami-Dade County. Northeast RDIA should be moved to south of Midtown rather than its current proposed location tot he east of Midtown. South location will put it closer to transit, further from CHHA, and won't obstruct view from Midtown. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.1
Policy LU-1.1.2
Policy LU-1.1.10
Policy LU-1.1.19
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.1
Objective TR-1.2
Policy TR-1.2.7
Objective TR-1.4
Policy TR-1.5.1
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy TR-1.7.5
Policy TR-2.2.10
Policy PR-1.1.2 |
| 194 |
Robert |
Hutt |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
The outreach was very minimal, only got a notice 10 days ago in the mail. It was a surprise to hear earlier in this meeting that District 5 had outreach because I didn't know about the meeting at all. There needs to be more publicity for this. More people need to know what's happening. Transportation is a big issue and it's crumbling in Midtown on 2nd Ave. There's no reason to increase density when there's already 16 projects in the pipeline in this area that will bring thousands of more units online soon. |
Acknowledged |
| 195 |
Mercedes |
Rodriguez |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
Due to the commission district maps changing and legal challenges, there may have been difficulties getting all neighborhoods involved with outreach. We know staff did their best to get as many meetings and people included. There may be a need for a few more meetings for District 1 and a citywide meeting so folks who were busy over the summer have a chance. |
District 1 and District 3 meetings were held after the 9/6/23 in response to the feedback on 9/18/2023 and 9/26/2023. In addition, there were two citywide meetings: 6/6/2023 and 7/19/2023. |
| 196 |
Paul |
Mann |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
1. Very concerned about the proposed density increases. Traffic is already bad and it's only going to get worse. I will not vote on any residential density increases until a proper transportation plan that is actually funded and has begun.
2. There's no protection for T3 in the MCNP. There's only one vague policy about protecting quality of life. There needs to be more specific protections for T3. |
During the meeting, there was discussion between Mann and Steiner about the County's RTZ program which already is permitting projects at higher densities than the City allows within the City (Downtown specifically) and that the City is just trying to answer the RTZ program. |
| 197 |
June |
Marcus |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
I'm a condo owner in Midtown Miami. There are a lot of social media sites out there if you want to get your message out to the people for better outreach. Brickell has 25,000 members; Miami Community has 10,000; and Midtown Miami has 3,000. |
Acknowledged |
| 198 |
Darlene |
N/A |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
I know you sent out notices only to folks within a certain distance of proposed land use map changes, but it would be nice for people not involved in a land use map change to be noticed so they can be aware that our input was welcomed. Also, community newspapers and social media are great suggestions for improving outreach. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Policy LU-6.2.2 |
| 199 |
Juan Carlos |
Zapata |
9/6/23 |
City Hall Public Meeting/
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
1. Governments do the bare minimum when it comes to noticing. There needs to be an improvement especially with language on notices sent out so lay people can understand what is happening.
2. Think twice about the proposed Northeast RDIA. The traffic in the area is terrible and it's not a good idea to increase density near interstate on and off ramps. Maybe consider doing it piecemeal a chunk at a time instead of all at once. |
The Planning Department has addressed this trough the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Policy LU-6.2.2 |
| 200 |
Jimmy |
Song |
9/7/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi, My name is Jimmy Songand I live at: 90 SW 3rd St., TH508, Miami FL 33101 I am not a lobbyist.I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through.The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population.We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Regards, Jimmy Song |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 201 |
Carlos |
Diaz |
9/7/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Hi Lakisha, Thanks for your time today. Attached please find the presentation we prepared for today’s call. Regards, Carlos L. Diaz Associate **NOTE: ATTACHMENT TITLED “TOD Presentation Planning Meeting.pdf” This attachment is a PDF of a presentation about a proposed amendment to Miami 21’s definition of Transit Oriented Development (TOD).** |
To further support ongoing coordination efforts with multi-agencies, the Transportation Element includes Policy Tr-1.6.1.4 and Goal LU-5 |
| 202 |
Judith |
Anderson |
9/7/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Very nice note Kathryn. Much appreciated. I appreciate the value in having a 2035 plan and the elements are very important and go to ensuring infrastructure keeps pace with development. I especially appreciate that storm water discharged into the Miami River is specifically mentioned. (With all the development along the river, it has surely been a real problem.) What's not considered in the comprehensive plan is the impact on residents of increasing density such as: -- LCD lights, which get much brighter with distance (meaning one might no longer be able to enjoy one's terrace after sunset because a LED advertisement is on the side of a new building) -- Noise pollution as density creates sound bounding off buildings (especially when buildings/restaurants have external speakers that compete with one another). These factors affect enjoyment of one's home directly. Social medial allows for sharing this information and it definitely drives where people want to live. Adapting the rules governing zoning and permits must continue to adapt with density and I encourage future comprehensive plans to cover these topics. Kind regards, Judith |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 203 |
Andreina |
Reyna |
9/7/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Neighborhood identity |
Economy |
Include Land Use Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave) MNCP must Include the commercial on Land Use " Mix-Use Cultural Corridors (properties on Grand Ave)" Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 204 |
Gustavo |
Perdomo |
9/7/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Neighborhood identity |
Economy |
Coconut Grove was the first Neighborhood Conservation District in Miami, to preserve the heritage , the identity and culture of this community. You must Include in the Land Use Map of MNCP the NCD-2, in the Full Format for Land Cultural Mix-Use exceptions as written in the "Appendix A". The forgotten neighborhood needs urgent attention and a revitalization program, The City of Miami must dedicate a special attention to keep their culture, heritage and the cultural Character ( Coconut Grove) |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 205 |
Russell |
Galbut |
9/7/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
we need more housing options in areas that are on main street with mass transit options |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 206 |
Jeff |
N/A |
9/7/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Green & open spaces |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Housing options are important |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 207 |
Kerri |
N/A |
9/7/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Green & open spaces
3. Natural resource conservation |
Other |
I believe with climate change upon us the need for proactive rather than reactive measures to mitigate climate change through resiliency should be a top priority |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Objective LU-6.1
Policy LU-6.1.1
Policy CM-6.4.2
Objective TR-1.2
Policy PR-9.1.4 |
| 208 |
Wendelin |
Weingartner |
9/11/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hi Kathryn, thank you for your fast reply. I actually was at the meeting, too bad there was no quorum possible. I don’t know whoever reads this correspondence but let me quickly make my case for leaving the zoning in Midtown/(dog park as we call it) as it is. I moved here from NYC 3 years ago, fell in love with Midtown and bought a condo in 4Midtown. I wanted to escape narrow New York streets, see more sun and not be pushed out by developers constantly. I am a laser scientist, my wife an auditing manager…what you call professionals. Both immigrants. Great careers. We got married last year and now have a newborn. We are very very happy here. You can imagine how disappointed we were to hear that there will be a new zoning proposal to build a 19 story building just in front of us. Again developments don’t stop at a stage where people are happy to live, again earning money in the short run is more important than creating a livable environment for everybody in a thriving community. We pay 20k$ property tax a year, if this new building goes up, Midtown is not worth that expense anymore, looking at it from a monetary perspective. We will sell our condo and move on again. Probably with a loss, but it is not worth to stay in a place that is not build for and around a community. I will be at the PZBA meeting and voice my concerns. Thank you Wendelin |
Acknowledged |
| 209 |
Seth |
Goldberg |
9/12/23 |
email |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
Morning Ryan, I’d meant to ask you about one other thing at the Planning Meeting/Community Discussion. We have no parks nearby Midtown. We presently have a big grassy area in front of the Target, but all that is land slated for building. 50% of people living in Midtown own a dog. That grassy area is presently where they let the dogs run. Soon enough that will be gone. Is there any plan to protect any area in Midtown to keep it a public green space? Alternatively, can some of the undeveloped land to the East of Midtown be purchased by the city and converted to greenspace? That’s something we ACTUALLY need in this vicinity. Would love to get your thoughts. Thank you. Seth Goldberg |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 210 |
Edward |
Martos |
9/13/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Thanks, Lakisha. I submitted my comments on this matter to you and Sue last week. I’ve attached that prior message to this one and also pasted it at the bottom of the threat. And I’ve copied “envisioning2035@miamigov.com so this chain can be included as part of the record. . It’s my understanding from the District Commissioner’s office that you’ve a concern about being able to timely conduct concurrency and similar analyses. That’s fair. I’d like to discuss what analyses are necessary and see how we can help collecting data, hiring consultants, or doing any other work that might be needed. This area serves as a gateway into Coconut Grove and the City of Miami. It’s also part of a neighborhood that’s long been targeted for revival. The proposed EAR amendment would provide a small spark to help develop this vacant area in a modest but important way. Please let me know when we can meet to discuss (virtually or in person). Thanks, EDWARD MARTOS PARTNER |
Per the MCNP EAR and F.S. processes, changes to land use designations will require a level of service and data analysis are required to make adjustments to increase densities. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 211 |
Jonathan |
Newberg |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami residents! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 212 |
Alex |
N/A |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Traffic |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
lack of affordable housing is a problem in ever increasing rental housing cost. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 213 |
Magaly |
Migoya |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Traffic |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Economy |
I would like to retire to a condo there….can’t afford it |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3
Policy LU-1.3.16 |
| 214 |
Hailey |
Bai |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 215 |
Carolyn |
Galan |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
More residential housing for residents while also having more roads |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 216 |
JC |
Aleman |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Tree coverage |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Parks & Recreation |
Need a bit more residential housing for all Miami residents as well as more green areas and trees, as it's very devoid of Park and lush greenery |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3
Objective NR-1.4
Policy NR-1.4.2
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.6 |
| 217 |
Mirley |
Rayo |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Transportation |
I need to develop more roads |
Acknowledged |
| 218 |
Mark |
T |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities |
Transportation |
Many streets are not pedestrian friendly. There are either no pedestrian walking path or no lights. It would be nice that Miami becomes a more walkable city. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.7
Policy LU-1.4.3
Objective LU-5.1
Policy LU-5.1.8
Policy LU-5.1.9
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.3.2 |
| 219 |
Stephanie |
N/A |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Increasing pedestrian & bike infrastructure
3. Traffic |
Transportation
Economy |
keep away the homeless, lanes for bikes, scooters and pedestrians. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.1.7
Objective LU-5.1
Policy TR-2.2.2
Policy TR-2.4.4
Objective TR-2.9
Policy HO-1.4.3
Policy HO-1.4.6 |
| 220 |
Steve |
Greene |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities |
Transportation |
Traffic is my biggest concern as the infrastructure "roads, & public transit " do not meet the demands to the development of residents moving into the Downtown Miami area. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.5.3
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy IC-2.1.4 |
| 221 |
Michael |
Hooper |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
affordable housing in multiple areas preferrably with public transit access |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 222 |
Soralin |
Delgado-Sanchez |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more residential properties and opportunities for all Miami Res. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 223 |
Adam |
Welch |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Infrastructure |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more housing options and more housing in general! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 224 |
Donna |
Ward |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Sea level rise & climate change
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Traffic |
Transportation |
to much development in the downtown-midtown area-traffic will be getting worse |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.5.3
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy IC-2.1.4 |
| 225 |
Henry |
Zalkin |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Traffic |
Transportation |
We need to improve mass transit options which help as the density increases. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy TR-2.23
Policy TR-2.2.5
Policy TR-2.2.10
Policy TR-2.4.1 |
| 226 |
Harry |
Dawson |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami Residents !!! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 227 |
Misley |
Rodriguez |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more residential oportunities. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 228 |
Fara |
Perez |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residentail opportunities for all Miami residents! |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 229 |
Jason |
Irizarry |
9/15/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to open more residential opportunities for all the Miami residents. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 230 |
Stefano |
Villa |
9/17/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
More residential opportunities for Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 231 |
Debbie |
Demera |
9/17/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
we need to unlock new residential opportunities for Miami Residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 232 |
Francisco |
Herretes |
9/18/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Efren, It seems thatPolicy PR-6.2.3, is the only mention of public art. I guess that would be my comment, that there is too little thought given to public art in Miami. We should be leading the country, and we're not. Policy PR-6.2.3: The City shall continue to work towards enhancement of public spaces (entrances, plazas, lobbies, courtyards and atriums) and gateways through artwork. The City shall use, whenever appropriate, the "Art in Public Places" allocation in public facility construction budgets as well as the assistance of the County Arts Council staff, and encourage private organizations to construct civic monuments at gateway locations. I think that "continue to work towards" doesn't do much at all. I think this should referencethe Masterplan, etc.I'll read the rest, thanks for sharing. Rgds, |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy PR-6.2.3
Goal PR-8
Policy PR-8.1.2 |
| 233 |
Pamela |
Medina |
9/18/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
Hi, My name is Pamela Medina and I live at 90 SW Third St, Apt 2806 Miami FL 33130 . I am against Re-zoning along Miami. Ave near Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in the Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. I am not a lobbyist. Please vote "no". Pamela Medina |
Acknowledged |
| 234 |
Esteban |
N/A |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
We need public transportation, mixed-use developments, affordable housing, and higher density. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5 |
| 235 |
Ilya |
Epshteyn |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 236 |
Odaly |
N/A |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Traffic
3. Garbage & recycling collection |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
we need more affordable housing |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4 |
| 237 |
Lidia |
Carrera |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami Residences |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 238 |
Chip |
Beverett |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more residential options for all Miami residents. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 239 |
Sexton |
Garcia |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
we'd like to unlock more residential opportunities for Miami residents. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 240 |
Jimea |
N/A |
9/18/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
we need unlocked more residential oportunities fro all Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 241 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Unmet needs
o Too many duplexes with too little parking
o Not pedestrian friendly
o Affordable housing (x2)
o Needed in other districts, like Allapattah
o Areas with more needs
o Schools, daycares – district has enough (x2)
o Parking unmet
o Certain uses – nightclubs - only in certain corridors
o “Will” to “shall” citizen does not agree. Thinks “will” should stay
o Domino effect with rezoning + change of neighborhood residential character
o 8th St to 12th St – architecture divided into too many units (SF homes split into duplexes)
o Inspection does not prevent/catch these
o Low homeownership
o District lower than Miami %
o Could Calle 8 be a case study?
o Affordable senior housing – unmet
o Neighborhood protection
o What can the city do to protect the neighborhoods?
o High rise – low rise apt (x2)
o Out of scale (T3.T8)
o The corridors Miami 21 created are negatively affecting neighborhoods
o Poor resilience after hurricane Andrew (infrastructure)
o Sewer still not fixed
o Communication from City to HOA’s, neighborhood associations
o Brickell’s development and infrastructure encroaching into the neighborhood (The Roads)
o Preserve existing home character
o Too many Airbnbs
o Assisted living facilities
o Too many. Too close |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal TR-2
Policy LU-1.1.7
Policy LU-1.1.3
Objective LU-1.5
Policy LU-1.6.9
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy HO-1.3.3
Policy HO-2.1.11
Policy LU-1.6.10
Policy LU-5.1.10
Policy LU-1.3.16
Policy HO-1.2.4
Goal SS-1 |
| 242 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Unmet needs
o Too many duplexes with too little parking
o Not pedestrian friendly
o Affordable housing (x2)
o Needed in other districts, like Allapattah
o Areas with more needs
o Schools, daycares – district has enough (x2)
o Parking unmet
o Certain uses – nightclubs - only in certain corridors
o “Will” to “shall” citizen does not agree. Thinks “will” should stay
o Domino effect with rezoning + change of neighborhood residential character
o 8th St to 12th St – architecture divided into too many units (SF homes split into duplexes)
o Inspection does not prevent/catch these
o Low homeownership
o District lower than Miami %
o Could Calle 8 be a case study?
o Affordable senior housing – unmet
o Neighborhood protection
o What can the city do to protect the neighborhoods?
o High rise – low rise apt (x2)
o Out of scale (T3.T8)
o The corridors Miami 21 created are negatively affecting neighborhoods
o Poor resilience after hurricane Andrew (infrastructure)
o Sewer still not fixed
o Communication from City to HOA’s, neighborhood associations
o Brickell’s development and infrastructure encroaching into the neighborhood (The Roads)
o Preserve existing home character
o Too many Airbnbs
o Assisted living facilities
o Too many. Too close |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal TR-2
Policy LU-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.3.14
Objective LU-1.5
Policy LU-1.6.9
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy HO-1.3.3
Policy HO-2.1.11
Objective CM-4.1
Policy CM-4.1.1
Policy CM-4.1.4 |
| 243 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
General Notes
o We are congesting the City. No more housing needed
o How are the big developments west of 17th Ave working?
o Affordable housing does not belong in some areas
o Maybe Flagler or 7th St
o Out of scale development
o The transect zones are destroying the fabric of the City by mixing densities
o Corruption, bribes
o No more high rises
o Neighborhood protection
o Investment in infrastructure (capital facilities)
o Communication is bad
o I-95, Metrorail, US1 have dissected The Roads
o We do not want to see any new development when it does not fit
o “The Comprehensive Plan is like the Bible, whatever is written is the law” |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Policy LU-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.6.9
Goal LU-5
Goal CI-1
Policy CI-1.1.4
Policy CI-1.1.17 |
| 244 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o More protection for pedestrians (x2)
o Pedestrian safety – 13th Ave, SW 20th St
o In line, with parks/open spaces
o Correlation
o Add signs, i.e., “watch for pedestrians”
o Coral Way Prep @ 13th Ave – poor circulation
o “we score a 1 in transportation”
o More separated bicycle lanes needed – separate from roads
o Mopeds, scooters are a problem
o Case study – Colorado (Denver)
o Narrow sidewalks, not enough room for pedestrians, bus stops
o Commutes are too long. They force people to have cars
o Ratio of new construction to parking is off
o Opa-Locka, Little Haiti |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal TR-2
Policy TR-1.4.2
Policy TR-2.4.4
Policy TR-2.2.2
Objective TR-2.6 |
| 245 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
General Notes
o Transportation issues
o Escalators do not work
o Bus
o Schedules
o Not a reliable system
o Unsheltered bus stops
o Safety structure for bicycles
o We need cars
o No transit, no parking = trouble |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-2.1.7
Policy TR-2.2.1
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.4 |
| 246 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o More parks + green space (x3)
o No park in The Roads neighborhood
o Only one park in Shenandoah
o Shared facilities are stretched too thin
o Maybe 12th Ave - Slow administrative process is an obstacle to City finding and purchasing lots to be pocket parks
o Free parking at park facilities is needed
o Park land taken by construction – program that exists to replace the land into a park elsewhere
o This program is not working
o Dog parks are preferred over parks for the elderly |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal PR-1
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.3
Policy PR-1.1.4
Policy PR-1.5.1
Policy PR-1.5.3 |
| 247 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Residents of The Roads need to go to Shenandoah or Coral Gables to find a park
o No accommodations for older people in the City of Miami, specially D3
o The City should do things for hardworking people
o Not many people go to the park in the City Hall and all parking is paid
o People do not use it
o We do not need more construction in D3
o Parks are needed desperately. We are giving parklands away
o There is land in The Roads sitting empty, but neighbors do not want pocket parks to avoid people from other places coming in |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal PR-1
Policy PR-1.1.2
Policy PR-1.1.3
Policy PR-1.1.4
Policy PR-1.5.1
Policy PR-1.5.3 |
| 248 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Bakeries – too expensive
o Supply of groceries. Retail is sufficient in The Roads
o This district benefits from a lot of tourist traffic
o Are we giving away money to Downtown, Brickell, not seeing even more tourist traffic
o No more Airbnbs allowed in the District’s residential areas
o Placement of new uses (x2)
o “where you place things is everything”
o Citizens not against change, but placement is |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Policy LU-1.1.7
Objective LU-1.3 |
| 249 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/18/23 |
Jose Marti Park Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o 13th Ave: walkability is ok
o If transportation was better, walkability would also improve
o Tourism on Calle 8
o Hotels on Calle 8?
o “there is a right place for everything” |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Policy LU-1.1.7
Objective LU-1.3 |
| 250 |
Fernando |
Benito |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Good afternoon, Please note that I am NOT a lobbyist. I am a resident at the Ivy building, part of the Riverfront complex. I strongly oppose the rezoning proposal along Miami avenue to allow for more density in future developments. The area is already too dense, traffic is unbearable and we do not have sufficient public transportation as an alternative. The traffic is already incredibly dense in normal situationsWhenever there is any event at the Hyatt or at the Arena, the area is completely clogged and unusable. Not even emergency vehicles cannot get through, and it is impossible for us to get home. We do not need more density in this area. We need more parks and public transportation. Please vote NO. Sincerely, Fernando Benito Moncada |
Acknowledged |
| 251 |
Emilio |
Balbi |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Hi my name is Emilio Jay Balbi. I live at 90 sw 3rd st #3312 Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda PZ 12/14395. I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". |
Acknowledged |
| 252 |
Judith |
Anderson |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation
Parks & Recreation |
Please note "NO" on increasing density: Agenda item 12 Hi, My name is Judith Anderson and I live at 92 SW 3rd street Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new additional buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as it is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and protected bike lanes, not more density. Please vote "no". |
Acknowledged |
| 253 |
Carl |
Fuentes |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Commerce, economy and job opportunities |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Unlock more Residential Opportunities for all Miami Residence |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 254 |
Neal |
Lipner |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We have a housing shortage, people can't afford to live here anymore and even natives are being priced out. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3
Policy HO-2.2.1 |
| 255 |
John |
N/A |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Infrastructure
3. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities |
Other |
Miami is on the cusp of becoming a technology hub. Updating the city infrastructure will support this growth. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-1
Policy LU-1.1.1
Goal CI-1
Policy CI-1.2.2 |
| 256 |
Sona |
McFarlane |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 257 |
Holly |
Laor |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Transportation |
too much traffic - increase mass transit |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.5.3
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy IC-2.1.4 |
| 258 |
Arturo |
de la Vega |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Increasing mass transit options |
Economy |
Improving the economy. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-1
Policy LU-1.3.4
Goal LU-5
Goal EDU-2 |
| 259 |
Pablo |
de Almagro |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unblock more residential opportunities for all Miami residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 260 |
Crystal |
Kaczkowski |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hello, resending my previous email about opposition to the zoning. 12 / 14395 See below message please ��. Crystal Kaczkowski **NOTE: The following text is the email Crystal re-sent** Hello, My name is Crystal Kaczkowski and I own a condo at 350 S. Miami Ave, Apt 2002, miami FL 33101. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 11 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along the Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. In the Riverfront complex, there’s already a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or the Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. Emergency vehicles cannot get through, and we are stuck. The city is very dense as it is, and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. I am not a lobbyist. Please vote "no". Crystal Kaczkowski |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-5.1.5
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.5.3
Policy TR-1.6.1.4
Policy IC-2.1.4
Goal EDU-1
Goal LU-1 |
| 261 |
Tina |
Lenis |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Subject: Vote "NO" on increasing density: Agenda item 12 Hi, My name is Ana Cristina Lenis and I live at 350 South Miami Avenue , Apto 1412 Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Thanks for your attention Ana c. Lenis |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 262 |
Ana |
Clarke |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hello my name is Ana Clarke and I live at: 350 S Miami Ave #4104 Miami FL 33130 I am writing in regards to agenda PZ 12/14395 I am opposed to the proposed re-zoning along the S Miami Ave bridge to allow for increased density. Currently, we are grappling with significant congestion issues, and numerous new buildings have already been approved. Whenever there's an event at Bayfront Park, James L. Knight Center, or the Miami Ave bridge is raised, traffic grinds to a halt. Regrettably, there are no alternative routes, making it impossible for us to get home. This situation also poses a significant challenge for emergency vehicles. Our city is already densely populated, and the existing infrastructure struggles to support the current population. What we truly need are more parks and schools, not further increases in density. Please vote NO on my request. Thank you -- Best Regards, Ana Clarke Sales Associate The Grand & Associates Realty, Inc. |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 263 |
Eduardo |
Arfelli |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hello, My name is Eduardo Arfelli and I live at 350 S Miami Ave. Apt 2701 Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. Pleasevote"NO". Best regards, Eduardo Arfelli |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 264 |
Caroline |
Almeida |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hi, My name is Caroline Almeidaand I live at the Wind Condominium 350 S Miami AvE ApT 2701 Miami FL 33101. I am not a lobbyist. I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density.Pleasevote"no". Thanks Caroline Almeida |
The City Commission recently adopted the Parks Master Plan. Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 265 |
Hossein |
Tavana |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board I am Dr. Hossein Tavana. I live at 350 S Miami Ave #1110, Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist and am writing in objection to the item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed increase in residential density in the Brickell area. While I understand the need for urban development and growth, I believe that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our community and its unique character. First and foremost, the proposed residential density increase could lead to overcrowding in an already congested area. Brickell has grown significantly over the years, and the infrastructure, including roads, public transportation, and parking facilities, has struggled to keep pace with this growth. Increasing density without corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate traffic congestion and diminish the quality of life for residents. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is crucial to ensure that the community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential to maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Hossein Tavana, PhD Hossein “Zane” Tavana, Ph.D., P.E. (TX) |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 266 |
Juan |
Outon |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
> Hello, > > My name is Juan Outon and I live at 92 sW 3rd St. Apt 3510, Miami FL 33101. > I am not a lobbyist. > I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). > > I am against Re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through. The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population. We need more parks and schools and not more density. > > Please vote "no". |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 267 |
Pedro |
Hernandez |
9/19/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need more residential opportunities for all Miami Residents |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 268 |
Ernesto |
Cruz |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board My name is Ernesto Cruz. I live at 92 SW 3rd Street #4802 Miami, FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist and am writing in objection to the item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed increase in residential density in the Brickell area. While I understand the need for urban development and growth, I believe that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our community and its unique character. First and foremost, the proposed residential density increase could lead to overcrowding in an already congested area. Brickell has grown significantly over the years, and the infrastructure, including roads, public transportation, and parking facilities, has struggled to keep pace with this growth. Increasing density without corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate traffic congestion and diminish the quality of life for residents. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is crucial to ensure that the community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential to maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ernesto Cruz |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 269 |
Kaitlyn |
Vadenais |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hi,My name is Kaitlyn Vadenais and I live at 92 SW 3rd Street, apt 1060 Miami FL 33130.I am not a lobbyist.I am writing in regards to agenda (PZ 12 / 14395). I am against re-zoning along Miami Ave bridge to allow for greater density. I live in The Riverfront complex. We already have a serious congestion problem and several new buildings are already approved. When there is an event at Bayfront park, or Miami Ave Bridge is raised, traffic comes to a stop. There is no workaround. We cannot get home. Emergency vehicles cannot get through.The city is very dense as-is and the infrastructure cannot support the population.We need more parks and schools and not more density. Please vote "no". Thank you, Kaitlyn |
Acknowledged |
| 270 |
Claudia |
Gonzalez |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board I am Claudia L. Gonzalez, I live at 90 SW 3rd. Street #2612. Miami, FL. 33130. I am not a lobbyist and I am writing in objection to the item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to bring to your attention my deep concerns regarding the increase of residential density in the Brickell area proposition. I understand the need for urban development and growth but I think that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our already overdeveloped, overcrowded and congested community, the Brickell area. Brickell has grown significantly over the past years, and the infrastructure ( roads, health facilities, public parks, public transportation, and parking facilities ) has struggled to keep up at the same pace of this growth. Increasing density without the corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate the current traffic congestion and noise pollution and diminish the quality of life for us, the residents, which are already facing these serious problems. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is imperative to ensure that our community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to please, carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential in maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you so much for your attention and consideration. Sincerely, Claudia L. Gonzalez |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 271 |
Jose Fernando |
Esteban |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board I am Jose F Esteban, I live at 90 SW 3rd. Street #4102. Miami, FL. 33130. I am not a lobbyist and I am writing in objection to item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to bring to your attention my deep concerns regarding the increase of residential density in the Brickell area proposition. I understand the need for urban development and growth but I think that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our already overdeveloped, overcrowded and congested community, the Brickell area. Brickell has grown significantly recently and over the past years, and the infrastructure like roads, health facilities, public parks, public transportation, and parking facilities has struggled to keep up at the same pace of this growth. Increasing density without the corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate the current traffic congestion and noise pollution and diminish the quality of life for us, the residents, who are already facing these serious problems. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is imperative to ensure that our community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to please, carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential in maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you Jose Esteban |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 272 |
Diana |
Diaz |
9/19/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board I am Diana Diaz, . I live at 350 S Miami Ave. I am not a lobbyist and am writing in objection to the item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed increase in residential density in the Brickell area. While I understand the need for urban development and growth, I believe that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our community and its unique character. First and foremost, the proposed residential density increase could lead to overcrowding in an already congested area. Brickell has grown significantly over the years, and the infrastructure, including roads, public transportation, and parking facilities, has struggled to keep pace with this growth. Increasing density without corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate traffic congestion and diminish the quality of life for residents. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is crucial to ensure that the community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential to maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Diana Diaz Image and Marketing Consultant |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 273 |
Cecilia |
Jimenez |
9/20/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We need to unlock more residential opportunities for all Miami residents. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Objective LU-4.1
Policy LU-1.4.2
Policy LU-1.4.3 |
| 274 |
Linda |
Truong |
9/20/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Commerce, economy, & job opportunities
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Economy
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
We need to create more job opportunities and increase housing options for residents. We need to improve traffic by increasing mass transit options. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Policy LU-1.3.6
Policy HO-2.1.11
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Goal EDU-2
Policy EDU-2.1.1
Policy EDU-2.1.1 |
| 275 |
Jansy |
N/A |
9/20/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Infrastructure
2. Increasing mass transit options
3. Traffic |
Transportation |
Public Transportation and Traffic |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-2.2.3
Policy TR-2.2.5
Objective TR-1.2 |
| 276 |
Christine |
Michaels |
9/20/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Greetings, Agenda #12/14395 My name is Christine Michaels, 90 SW 3rd Street. As a long time Brickell resident for 23 years and now having lived on the river since 2009, I urge you to vote NO to move the boundary within our Riverfront Condo complex. We have 3 empty lots and knew one day something would be built. But now in 2023 in witnessing the explosion of condo building construction all around with no smart planning, it does not make any sense to allow more density when the clear fact is that we have no land to add more sensible public transportation. Soon a traffic light will need to be installed to exit on SW 3rd street and we have not even built on our empty lots. The City cannot add "bus only lanes" in Downtown/Brickell, there is no land to add more metromovers. Given the extreme heat 6 months of the year, even walking is not an option for many that we have to rely on cars. Brickell and downtown Miami simply does not have the infrastructure to support more high-rise buildings. Residents are screaming for more green parks. Should not "smart planning" be defined as planning before building? That is not happening. What we do know is that more elected officials are accepting illegal monies as indicated in today's Miami Herald article With half of Miami’s elected officials under investigation, the city’s history is repeating (yahoo.com) I do however support the Planning Dept's idea of "redevelopment" of existing buildings in blighted areas such as parts of downtown Miami. This will have less negative impact on the earth and easy access to Metro Movers already exists. Much relies on you, the PZAB. Thank you for your time, attention and willingness to serve our community. Sincerely, Christine Michaels |
Acknowledged |
| 277 |
Andrea |
Baraybar |
9/20/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Members of Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board I am Andrea Baraybar. I live at 92 SW 3rd St, Miami FL 33130 . I am not a lobbyist and am writing in objection to the item PZ 12/14395 on the Sep. 20, 2023 meeting agenda. I would like to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed increase in residential density in the Brickell area. While I understand the need for urban development and growth, I believe that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our community and its unique character. First and foremost, the proposed residential density increase could lead to overcrowding in an already congested area. Brickell has grown significantly over the years, and the infrastructure, including roads, public transportation, and parking facilities, has struggled to keep pace with this growth. Increasing density without corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate traffic congestion and diminish the quality of life for residents. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is crucial to ensure that the community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential to maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Andrea |
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
| 278 |
Renita |
Holmes |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
This is not fair to Black people. Please do not approve/send to the state. |
Acknowledged |
| 279 |
X |
X |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Other |
There's a concrete batching plant that sometimes operates 24 hours per day. There are negative externalities. Once properties build out in the RIDA, people near by oppose it. |
Acknowledged |
| 280 |
Russell |
Galbut |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Thank you City for seriously looking at this issue. This is the appropriate place to put this housing. No one had looked at FLR, though. This only allows more density. I want to commend the entire Planning Department because their recommendation is spot on. The increase in density reduces intensity. This recommendation is to increase density without increasing intensity. There's no increase in space for the added housing. Especially with working from home. It's logical, appropriate, and proper. |
Acknowledged |
| 281 |
Indecipherable |
Indecipherable |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
I want to question the need for increased density in the northeast area. Population is increasing. Vacancy is decreasing. But, Ex. L has an analysis of population growth. Projected population growth for the Northeast RDIA does not support the recommendation. Then there's the Coastal High Hazard Area. Does it matter? Building in this area is already happening. There are already 7 projects in the pipeline. 2,700 dwelling units in the pipeline. Please remove this from the proposal. Everything else is perfectly correct. |
Acknowledged |
| 282 |
Luis |
Vizcaya |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
We met yesterday. We gave a recommendation but I don't see it. I want you to recognize how bad the traffic is. I'm trying to defend my property. Do we have to destroy the city of Miami? |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
LU-1.6.10
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.3.3.2
Objective TR-1.4 |
| 283 |
Clara |
Garcia |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Two points: 1st is I speak to the Coconut Grove community. This community, the Black community, has been forgotten. Miami-Dade County does not care about lighting, the sidewalk, and we have a nonprofit that supports the neighbors. Whote cares? Planning Department cares? City Commision care? Nobody cares? But we need you to support to change the land use and the zoning of the west side of Grand Ave. There should be double density. Dedicate 50% for affordable housing. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6 |
| 284 |
Christine |
McDonald |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
I reached out to the Planning Department. I commend Ryan; he's very helpful. I dug into the MCNP. As I looked at this plan it does not seem sensible. Two weeks ago, we talked about this. There's no plan for more transportation. We have a chance to think about transportation. It's backwards. To correct the River Quadrant RDIA, there'd be more density. We cannot add more trains. We could correct the deficiency. Please do not move that boundary. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
LU-1.6.10
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.3.3.2
Objective TR-1.4
Goal HO-2
Objective HO-2.1 |
| 285 |
Ed |
Martos |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Economy |
Three issues. Please approve the EAR amendments with changes. On behalf of Braman. He runs a business. That business has been there since 1975. Before then, there was another car dealership. There's an affordability crisis. 2nd issue: owner of 3600 Biscayne Blvd is outside of the Northeast RDIA and wants to be in the RDIA. 3rd issue: group of owners owning a small strip of proeprty have aspirational requests. This one strip is part of cultural strip, intended to allow a mix of uses. The FLUM does not allow a mix of uses: barbarshops, etc. I propose a text chagne that will allow that small strip a way to allow a mix of uses. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-1.2.2
Goal LU-4
Policy HO-2.1.6
Policy HO-2.1.2
Policy HO-2.1.7
Policy TR-1.1.3
Policy PR-1.5.2 |
| 286 |
Luis |
Morales |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Part of the Jose Marti meeting. We let them know we don't want more construction. We don't want constructino that does not conform with the existing construction. Now new construction are sugar cubes. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.3 |
| 287 |
Rick |
Madan |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation
Economy |
President of Biscayne HOA. Recently did a surve as to what is important to you for residents. Crime, safety, green space, traffic. The changes I see here, and what I've read, and the studies that have been done, big buildings and stuff go up. These do not help the community. At night, people go home and crimes go up. The reports are not correct. I do not want large office buildings. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal LU-1
Objective LU-1.1
Policy LU-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.2.3
Policy LU-1.6.8
Goal LU-5 |
| 288 |
Renita |
Holmes |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
The issue with density is that there are people who need to be sustained. Some of us only had land. Environmental justice. |
Acknowledged |
| 289 |
Iris |
Escarra |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Explaining RTZ and the existential thread. Live Local. |
Acknowledged |
| 290 |
|
Newberg |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
In favor of density increase. This part of Miami needs to be modernized. Put density in the right areas of the city. |
Acknowledged |
| 291 |
Seth |
|
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Transportation |
When you live in the city, you should expect density. I can get anwhere in NYC in 15 mins. Here, in Miami, that's not true. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-1.1.1
Policy TR-1.1.4
Policy TR-2.1.1 |
| 292 |
Jefferson |
Bragg |
9/20/23 |
PZAB |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We have the dubious distinction of being the most prosperous. We have lack of supply. Rent is high. Most unaffordable market. Even Braman's workforce cannot afford to live here. We have a chance to do something about this. Support staff's recommendations. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.2
Policy HO-1.1.10
Policy HO-1.2.3 |
| 293 |
Eileen |
Orta |
9/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Sea level rise & climate change |
Transportation
Housing & Neighborhoods |
I believe the MCNP was thoughtfully crafted and updated to tackle ongoing issues. Understanding that Miami 21 would still govern the zoning of development and future aspirations it provides a strong base to which Miami 21 can then enforce and regulate as best suited for the neighborhoods being impacted. I believe the nature of transit corridors opens opportunities for neighborhood developments and housing supply growth and this plan assists with it becoming reality for the future of our City. The plan thoughtfully keeps traffic concerns and established residential neighborhoods in mind with promoting ways to focus on those protections. |
Acknowledged |
| 294 |
Krys |
Gouverneur |
9/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Sea level rise & climate change
3. Increasing mass transit options |
Other |
MIami has great momentum and getting the MCNP right will be critical to its long term success. Miami has to provide to all social classes and recognizing that developments can coexist with sustainability is fundamental. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Goal LU-6
Policy HO-1.2.3 |
| 295 |
Ed |
Sperling |
9/21/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing mass transit options
2. Traffic
3. Education |
Other |
The Miami comprehensive neighborhood plan is a forward-looking plan that will prepare the city of Miami for growth as it progresses to a large-scale metropolis. It is important to note that while the plan will implement planning and zoning amendments that all developments will still be required to act within the code and requirements of Miami 21. All future developments will also still be required to submit to Planning and Zoning and UDRB for review which will ensure that developments are not proposed that will negatively impact the community. The plan implements transit benefits that will help improve the public transportation within Miami and the County that allow for a decrease in traffic. The other important thing to note is that this plan will bring significant tax dollars to the city of Miami which will allow for improved infrastructure and education. |
Acknowledged |
| 296 |
Adam |
Metzger |
9/22/23 |
OpenCities |
1. Increasing housing options
2. Density
3. Commerce, economy and job opportunities |
Transportation |
Increasing density, especially around the new train stations, will help Miami move towards a public transportation mode, alleviating traffic, improving the health of the environment, and reducing the need for people to own cars. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy LU-5.1.7
Policy LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.1.4 |
| 297 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Workforce housing near Health District
o Affordable housing
o Lack of affordable housing (even though some is being constructed)
o Balance between development + maintaining identity
o No need to build more if it is not affordable
o Smaller housing that is too expensive. Not helpful
o Some good examples:
o Three towers (affordable), Los Licas (spelling)
o Immigrants need affordable housing
o How to afford staying in neighborhood with lower-income LONG-TERM
o Transition from renting to owning
o In Allapattah – want to stay but cannot
o Population change may be low, but there is change in demographics
o People from out of state
o Grants (federal, local) to preserves current housing, increase affordability
o 17th St corridor – mixed-use with residential on 2nd floor + commercial on 1st
o Property tax – preventing displacement based on high taxes
o Opportunities for smaller developers
o Redevelopment on 7th Ave / 17th / 22nd /12th
o Commercial (mom + pop) with residential where maybe business owners can live
o 7th Ave + 7th St – redevelopment of empty lots
o Industrial may be nuisance to residents
o Unique/proud character |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-1.1.2
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy HO-1.2.2
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-1.3.16
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.10
Policy HO-2.16 |
| 298 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
o Workforce housing around healthcare district
o Affordable housing - not enough
o People cannot afford what is “affordable”
o Build more houses but if they are too expensive you “did nothing”
o A smaller product sometimes is more expensive
o Half the house is sometimes 80% of the price
o Affordable developments
o The 3 towers, Brisas del Este, Mosaic
o People want more buildings like these
o We have a growing immigrant community with low wages
o Buildings are not welcoming to all types of people
o People want to stay in Allapattah, but they cannot afford it anymore
o People moving are different from the traditional residents living in the area
o How can we increase affordable housing?
o Use the money from Mixed-use buildings as extra income for residents (small business+ housing on top)
o 17th St corner – Elementary school
o Changing the mindset
o Redistribute funds
o Smaller developments throughout the City instead of condensing everything in one place.
o Allapattah is diverse (people, buildings)
o New development on 7th Ave + 17th Ave + 12th Ave + 22nd Ave
o Redevelopment (business + housing)
o 7th Ave + 7th St – part of the vacant lots might be outside of the district
o Mom & pop to maintain the fabric of the neighborhood
o The industrial areas are different
o Concrete (27th St) by “La Placita”
o Nobody wants to live here (noise, pollution)
o Marine by the river
o This is one of the few industrial areas in the City
o Neighbors are proud of this industrial area |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Goal LU-4
Policy HO-1.1.2
Policy HO-1.1.11
Policy HO-1.2.2
Goal LU-5
Policy LU-1.3.16
Goal HO-1
Objective HO-1.1
Policy HO-1.1.10
Policy HO-2.16 |
| 299 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Rail (positive), Miami transit (positive) but we need more trolley
o Short-distance, elderly, young people college
o Trolleys from north to south have to long headways
o Poor connection
o Intermodal connectivity needed
o Bus stops are usually unsheltered with exposure to elements
o Cooperation with other agencies (like county, who is redoing system)
o Routes are too short (unless going to Kendall or maybe Hialeah)
o Take as long as cars sometimes, but good if you work in area
o Need for ways to get to station (like is Allapattah)
o Transportation near Blue Lagoon, along Dolphin |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-2.5.2
Policy TR-2.5.5
Policy TR-2.6.1
TR-1.2.3
Goal TR-2
Objective TR-2.1
Objective TR-2.5 |
| 300 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Transportation |
o Rail is good (MD Transit is good)
o People want more trolleys
o Home-supermarket-home
o Seniors and young people
o Only 1 bus route on 17th Ave – 20th St (Spanish: 1 sola ruta por la 17 Ave – 20 St. No hay suficientes rutas de bus)
o Routes take too long
o Many people say this
o Trolley is very limited and is not interconnected with buses (Spanish: trolley es muy limitado y no está interconectado con los buses)
o Many people say this
o Bus stops are usually unsheltered
o There is one shelter by Brisas del Este
o Bus is better than people realize
o The route for Metrorail is too short unless you’re going to Kendall/Hialeah
o If you live in that area the system is great. |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy TR-2.5.2
Policy TR-2.5.5
Policy TR-2.6.1
Policy TR-2.4.7
Policy LU-5.1.1 |
| 301 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Duarte, Grapeland, Curtiss, Reagan, Fern Isle (quality parks)
o If you saw green + concrete map, there is a deadline in parks away from major corridors
o Exercise machines popular (more visitors)
o Place to roller skate
o Redevelopment of golf course nearby
o Missed feelings
o Queston about new walkways near Blue Lagoon, allowing connection to Antonio Maceo
o Desire for connectivity to waterfront |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-3.2.7
Policy PR-5.2.2
Additionally, the new Reimagine Parks Miami: Parks & Recreation Master Plan addresses residents' feedback on the variety of amenities in the City's parks. |
| 302 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Parks & Recreation |
o Duarte park is good
o There is less greenery around the highway
o People like exercise equipment and they are always packed
o More places to roller skate (one by Curtiss park)
o Grapeland / Curtiss / Ronald Reagan / Fern Isle
o Behind Antonio Maceo Parks there are rumors about some park development or walkway by the lake (Blue Lagoon) |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-3.2.7
Policy PR-5.2.2
Additionally, the new Reimagine Parks Miami: Parks & Recreation Master Plan addresses residents' feedback on the variety of amenities in the City's parks. |
| 303 |
Round Table |
Round Table |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Some people want to keep industrial
o Workforce housing for Health District workers
o Staff (not just nurses + doctors)
o Housing for workers at autobody shops / construction (low-scale industrial)
o Teacher housing
o Walkability
o Does not feel accessible by foot
o Businesses lose revenue because lack of parking
o Aldi / Walmart is nice
o 20th Street – la veinte y la veinte (regional economic attraction)
o Bring back smaller shops
o 17th to 27th / used to be more small businesses
o Like Miracle Mile (or more landscaping, walkability)
o Decline in this area (wholesale + regular retail)
o Wedding dresses / other clothing stores at 20th + 20th
o Port Authority / Miami River / international trade |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective LU-1.2
Objective LU-1.3
Policy LU-1.3.3
Policy LU-1.3.6
Goal PA-3
Objective PA-1.1
Policy PA-1.1.2
Objective PA-3.4
Policy LU-1.2.6 |
| 304 |
General Notes |
General Notes |
9/26/23 |
Melreese D1 Public Meeting |
N/A |
Economy |
o Some people want to keep the industrial areas
o A significant % of the people work in the Health Districts (not necessarily doctors/nurses) also maintenance, police, fire, cafeteria servers, body shops, construction, Restaurant Depot
o Create affordable opportunities
o Aldi (x2), Walmart
o 20th St back to “la 20 y la 20” to be alive again
o This area had good prices (wholesale/retail)
o Flea market and also good quality
o Even before covid this area was decaying
o People from Homestead came shopping here
o Diverse economy (hospital / education / School Board / transportation / logistics)
o Works on its own (Spanish: funciona por si mismo)
o Make the 20 & 20 a boulevard (like the Grove)
o Trees (shade/shelter), walkability
o Some buildings are owned by holding companies not reinvesting. Just waiting for the next wave
o Maybe specialize in a specific market to create something unique |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Objective LU-1.2
Objective LU-1.3
Policy LU-1.3.3
Policy LU-1.3.6
Goal PA-3
Objective PA-1.1
Policy PA-1.1.2
Objective PA-3.4
Policy LU-1.2.6
Policy LU-5.1.11
Objective NR-1.4 |
| 305 |
Christine |
Michaels |
9/27/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods
Transportation |
Good day Yvette and Commissioner King, My name is Christine Michaels and I live in the Riverfront Condos. at 90 SW 3rd Street which is now part of District 5. Last month I received one of those notices in the mailbox about upcoming PZAB meeting to discuss proposals that would have immediate impact on our quality of life here at our residence. I had no idea the details and went right over to City Admin building and met with Ryan Shedd, Principal Planner who essentially put together the MNCP. He educated me on the proposed changes and I shared it with neighbors. I attended the first PZAB meeting Sep 6 to share our collective concerns. But there was no quorum. Instead, they turned it into a townhall meeting which was to everyone's benefit. The director of Planning educated everyone on the process and that this had to be voted on this month as State of Florida had a deadline of Oct 31. There would be changes and it will come back to us and changes would not be implemented until next year. Regardless this did require a vote soon. And that vote is tomorrow Sep 28 by City Commissioners. 100% of residents in attendance (except those who were attorneys for developers) were against it. West Grove needs more development, but the rest of Miami is overdeveloped and there is not enough infrastructure. That was agreed by everyone. Board member Zapata recognized the developers with private monies can move much quicker than government entities. The fact remains that solutions presented to residents take over 20 years or are semi implemented or never implemented due to restrictive costs. IN the end, the developers not residents benefit. Last week at the Sep 20 meeting, (which I strongly encourage you to listen to recording since vote failed and therefore commissioners did not receive "recommendations") board members Zapata, Dominguez, and Mann had brought up very intelligent questions and facts that resonated with every resident. They received thunderous applause from residents. The current plan benefits developers. There needs to be triggers or plans where developers cannot build until infrastructure is in place. That is what we call smart planning which never happens in Miami. Specifically, where I live, there is boundary that runs through our property. See first attachment. This appears to be an administrative error from years ago. But this mistake is a blessing! Per Ryan Shedd (Principal Planner) you can reject to move this. We are urging you to vote against moving this boundary (see attachment 2) to NOT allow more density. As I stated in person at both the Sep 6 townhall meeting and last week's meeting, Downtown Brickell we all know is overdeveloped. All PZAB members at Sep 6 townhall agreed as well as residents from all districts. There is no land to add more public transportation. 1. we cannot build subways as we are at sea level 2. there is no land to add eminent domain where you can add bus only lanes 3. there is no land to add more metromover stops 4. the current metromover system is poorly maintained, (My 81-year-old mother cannot climb those flight of stairs when elevator is not working) and not safe at night (my neighbor was attacked on weeknight it was all over news and residents will no longer take it in evenings. We rather call Uber). I understand from Planning Dept, the City has the power to accept and reject parts of the Comprehensive plan. I have lived in downtown since 2000 and am a native Floridian. Speaking for my 1500 neighbors. We work hard, pay our taxes yet we see zero benefits. We only see our neighborhood going backwards. Only increased litter, homeless, crime and less police officers. I was assaulted by homeless person, and almost attacked three other occasions. So much for safe, walkable city. Which I would like to meet with Commissioner King and staff to discuss a host of issues but I also have solutions. We can discuss later. Ms. King, please vote against this plan. We heard passionate pleas from West Grove residents as well. Specifically, please do not move boundary in our community. This would allow 500 units/ acre on that tiny sliver vs. 150 units/acre. I look forward to meeting you all soon to meet our new commissioner after redistricting and to discuss the other issues. We had the great benefit of open and easy communication in person with Sabina Covo in our former District 2. We hope we can expect the same level of attention and service from District 5. Sincerely, Christine Michaels |
Acknowledged |
| 306 |
Zane |
Tavana |
9/28/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Dear Ms. Harrell I am Dr. Hossein “Zane” Tavana. I am an owner at the Riverfront condominium complex and live at 350 S Miami Ave #1110, Miami FL 33130. I am not a lobbyist and am writing in objection to moving Riverfront boundary as part of MNCP Sep 28 meeting. I would like to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed increase in residential density in the Brickell area. While I understand the need for urban development and growth, I believe that the current proposal may have several adverse effects on our community and its unique character. First and foremost, the proposed residential density increase could lead to overcrowding in an already congested area. Brickell has grown significantly over the years, and the infrastructure, including roads, public transportation, and parking facilities, has struggled to keep pace with this growth. Increasing density without corresponding improvements in infrastructure will likely exacerbate traffic congestion and diminish the quality of life for residents. This increase will put additional strain on public services, such as schools, healthcare facilities, and emergency services. It is crucial to ensure that the community’s needs are met adequately before introducing a significant influx of new residents. I urge the Miami Planning Board to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this proposal on Brickell’s residents. I believe that a more balanced approach to development, which includes thoughtful consideration of infrastructure improvements and community well-being, is essential to maintaining the unique character of Brickell. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Hossein “Zane” Tavana, PhD |
Acknowledged |
| 307 |
James |
Therrien |
9/28/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Hi Ms. Hull, My name is James Therrien and I spoke today at the City Council meeting regarding PZ 15, I was presenting a petition opposing the rezoning as it applied to a midtown greenspace. We talked a bit afterwards, and thank you for that. I wanted to reach out and start the dialog. I believe you had mentioned that I could send the petitions to you for consideration for revisions to the plan, is this correct? Cheers and have a wonderful day, --James |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.1.2
Goal PR-1
Policy PR-1.1.1
Policy PR-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.2.3 |
| 308 |
Yvonne |
Bayona |
9/28/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Requested changes to Single Family Residential and Duplex Residential Land Use Designations by Property Owners and Miami Historic East Shenandoah HOA & Vizcaya Roads HOA as follows: 1. No Children Day Care, Primary schools, Secondary Schools, museums, place of worship, correction rehabilitation facilities, tourist homes, guest homes, hotels, bed & breakfast, museums private clubs, lodges, professional offices allowed in T3 or T3R or a Conservation District area which is in a residential neighborhood. 2. Children Day Cares, Primary schools, Secondary schools, shall be located at least 1,000 feet from another existing Children Day Care, Primary Schools, and Secondary schools in the Commercial Zone area. |
The Planning Department is coordinating with Commission District 3 and the City Attorney's Office in regards to reviewing this request.
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through a parallel process under Policy LU-5.2.1 to ensure compliance with Federal, State and County Codes/Policies, as applicable. Based on final scope, this effort could occur through a Miami 21 Code process. |
| 309 |
James |
Therrien |
9/29/23 |
email |
N/A |
Other |
Thank you Ms. Hull, Hi everyone and thanks for your time. Yesterday I spoke at the city council meeting representing a group of neighbors from Midtown opposing amendment #10544 (item PZ 15), specifically as it applies to the greenspace between Buena Vista Blvd, 1st Ave., 34th St., and Hwy 27. I put into public record a petition of 200+ signatures and comments to this effect, and afterwards Ms. Hull approached me to submit them to her here as well. I have attached for you a transcript of my presentation to the City Council, as well as 2 bundled PDFs of the signatures and comments currently available to me. We also have a list of hand-signed petitions which were submitted as well, and I'll follow up with copies of those when they become available. Please let me know whatever else I or my neighbors can do to affect this rezoning. It is something we feel very strongly about. Best, --James Therrien **NOTE: The email contained 3 attachments: “City Council Meeting 928 PZ 15.txt”, “SaveTheGreenspace_Merged.pdf”, and “SaveTheGreenspace_Merged2.pdf”** |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs:
Policy PR-1.1.2
Goal PR-1
Policy PR-1.1.1
Policy PR-1.1.3
Policy LU-1.2.3 |
| 310 |
Maria |
Mann |
9/29/23 |
email |
N/A |
|
In the introduction it tells about the boom of high-rises in the 2000's, it also talks about building upon the City of Miami's unique history, embrace its culturally diverse population, and preserve neighborhood vitality while promoting a vibrant urban metropolitan area that supports multi-modal transportation and mixed-use communities. I honestly don't believe that every neighborhood wants a mixed-use community, especially the older established single-family and duplex neighborhoods. |
The Comprehensive Plan includes policies that allow for "master, sector and visioning" planning efforts to be applied in a community context, which would be implemented under Miami 21 Code. Per Section 163.3168 (2-3) F.S., "Local governments are encouraged to apply innovative planning tools, including, but not limited to, visioning, sector planning, and rural land stewardship area designations to address future new development areas, urban service area designations, urban growth boundaries, and mixed-use, high-density development in urban areas. The state land planning agency shall help communities find creative solutions to fostering vibrant, healthy communities, while protecting the functions of important state resources and facilities. . ." The proposed Neighborhood Planning program (which is a new policy: LU-5.2.1) would be launched in communities that would like to have visioning or master planning effort that would be advanced for inclusion in the Miami 21 Code. This will allow for a more focused approach in conducting neighborhood planning approach for areas of interest to assist in address quality of life concerns. |
| 311 |
Alex |
Miranda |
10/2/23 |
email |
N/A |
Transportation |
We appreciate the opportunity to enter public comment on behalf of the Midtown Miami Community
Development District and representatives from 2Midtown condominium association and its 3,000 plus
stakeholders & residents, we took a survey and the community opposes this rezoning request and
would like to request a new traffic study be done so that it reflect traffic conditions today which are
extremely congested during morning and afternoon peak hours. We need to know the plans on
reducing traffic congestion before supporting a rezoning. This should not be rushed through without
proper consideration |
The Planning Department has addressed this through the following GOPs: Policy LU-1.6.10
LU-5.1.11
Policy TR-1.2.7
Policy TR-1.3.3.1
Policy TR-1.3.3.2 |
| 312 |
Antoun |
Chebat |
10/5/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
Hello Mr. Goldberg, I trust you are well. We are reviewing the exciting new Future Land Use for Miami 2035 and have a question; will the areas with increasing density also be up-zoned? If so, will it be in tandem with the density increase? Thank you and I look forward to reviewing your response. All my best, Antoun Chebat |
Per the State's Evaluation and Appraisal Report Process, any potential rezoning occurs after City Commission's adoption of the EAR following Second Reading, which is anticipated to occur mid 2024 (upon completion of State and other agencies review). Please keep in mind that the proposed documents are still in-draft form as on-going multi-agency coordination occurs throughout this process. This will be a Neighborhood Planning effort/initiative. |
| 313 |
Beba |
Mann |
10/5/23 |
email |
N/A |
Housing & Neighborhoods |
We should create an NCD for Silver Bluff. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to add now to the MCNP draft and then amend Miami 21 or vice a versa. I am attaching the suggested language for the NCD for Silver Bluff. Thank you so much for all your help. |
Creating a new Neighborhood Conservation District can be done without changing the Miami Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan, as a new NCD would not create an inconsistency with the MCNP, per FS 163.3194.
Planning Department hopes to address this comment through Policy LU-5.2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|